Western nations and their lapdog allies are falling over themselves to impose the most ridiculous sanctions on Russia. The high point, or low point depending on your point of view, would probably have to be the international council that judges pedigree cats which booted out Russia in a tumultuous display of feline ferocity. The competition’s organisers for one brief moment made themselves newsworthy.
Which is the point – they got some attention. It’s virtue signaling gone to its extremes, and virtue signaling is just about the only thing left that the West knows how to do.
Keep in mind that this feline judging group is a private entity. They are not related to any government. They have not been told to do this. Rather, they are doing it off their own bat. Someone woke up in the morning, turned on CNN, sucked down the latest bout of lies, rose up from the table and raised their arms to the ceiling and declared, “From this day no Russian cats will take home the trophies!” Tell me that I’m wrong, that it didn’t happen that way. Of course it did, because that scene is ridiculous but the whole West has gone up its own backside in levels of ridiculousness not seen since the pitch of the film that would become Animal House.
Russians are now being actively persecuted in the West by private companies. Take this story of the Russian woman living in Amsterdam who had her rental contract cancelled by the company that manages her house. There is no legal justification for this, but courts around the West will do as they are told by the political whims of the day. They judge based upon feelings and mood, not law. So she will lose.
We are not yet at war with Russia but we are acting as if that already was the case. Which is astonishing. I have had conversations with people in the Netherlands who are justifiably concerned at what might happen to their families if real war breaks out, while in the same breath they will solemnly declare that Russia must be punished. It seems as if the citizens of Europe in particular live in a fantasy land where they can act against others but retaliation is not supposed to return in kind. In their minds, this would not be fair. Because they are European and thus they are good.
I have seen reports that universities are removing from their curriculums works by Russian writers. Very serious works by guys like Dostoevsky. This sort of thing never happened in the entire history of the Cold War. It could be argued that we don’t have real universities anymore, that these places are simply bastions of virtue signaling, which is true. But this argument omits the effect that this virtue signaling has. Because during the Cold War, the Soviet Union banned just about everything from the West, which was a symptom of its underlying totalitarianism. But it was the Soviet government that enforced the banning.
Today, the situations have been reversed. And private companies and individuals are taking it upon themselves to act in this way without being forced to by our governments. Which makes us many degrees worse than the Soviet Union. And this makes sense when you examine the bigger picture. The West virtue signals because it has no virtue. The West turned its collective back on God and now it acts as if it exists in a Godless world. Which means that we are the baddies.
In a provocative statement on March 6th, 2022, Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said the US had given the “green light” for Poland to deliver fighter jets to Ukraine, promising that the US would replace any fighters that the Poles send to the Ukrainian government. This came after Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky demanded more weapons and aid in a Zoom call with the US Congress on March 5th. Zelensky also demanded that the US declare a no-fly zone over Ukraine, which would oblige the US military and NATO allies to shoot down Russian aircraft and would thus be tantamount to a declaration of war on Russia.
.@SecBlinken: The U.S. has given the “green light” to NATO countries if they choose to provide fighter jets to Ukraine, one day after President Zelensky made a plea to members of Congress to provide them during a Saturday Zoom call. https://t.co/liDkdNCAFIpic.twitter.com/3vHqk6YzQe
While it is unlikely at this stage that the US will engage in direct warfare with Russia, the groundwork is being laid to prolong the fight against Russia indefinitely by sending shipments of weapons from nearly all NATO states into Ukraine. President Biden has reportedly asked congress for $10 billion in aid for Ukraine, $4.8 billion of which will be to cover the cost of US troop deployments to countries on the Ukrainian border and restock weapons the Pentagon has already sent to Ukraine. This is on top of a $200 million “lethal aid” package the US approved in December and another $350 million package approved last week. These appropriations include Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles. Between 2014 and 2021, the US sent $2.5 billion in “lethal aid” to Ukraine.
European governments have joined the US in pumping Ukraine full of weapons. According to a NATO statement:
Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, the United Kingdom and the United States have already sent or are approving significant deliveries of military equipment to Ukraine. Ukraine has already received critical weapons, including Javelin missiles and anti-aircraft missiles, from NATO Allies, as well as millions of euros of financial assistance.
The German government broke with their longstanding policy of not sending weapons to active war zones by sending 500 Stinger missiles, 1,000 anti-tank missiles and 400 rocket-propelled grenade launchers to Ukraine. The Germans also approved the shipment of nine German made Howitzer cannons from Estonia, a move which it had previously blocked. Sweden and Finland have pledged 5,000 and 1,500 anti-tank missiles respectively, along with rifles, ammunition and field rations.
In a particularly Orwellian move, the European Union pledged €450 million euros from the “European Peace Facility” to reimburse member states for any weapons they send to Ukraine. The Facility was established in 2021 to fund a potential conflict with Russia and has a total of €5 billion euros pledged by member states through 2027.
In total, at least 17,000 anti-tank weapons have been shipped from the West into Ukraine in the last week. In addition to weapons shipments, the US and NATO allies have been encouraging their citizens and veterans to go and fight as irregulars on behalf of Ukraine. There can be no doubt that Western funded mercenaries are already operating inside of Ukraine. The purpose of all this is to bog down and delay Russian forces and make the conflict last as long as possible.
On March 7th, the NY Times published a report in which several military experts claim that the Russians are demoralized and on the brink of defeat. While loaded with unsourced claims that the Russian military is emotionally devastated by losing elite units to the plucky democratic rebels of Ukraine, these experts inevitably admit that they have no real evidence for such conjecture and acknowledge that a Russian victory is inevitable in the long run.
To be sure, most military experts say that Russia will eventually subdue Ukraine’s army. Russia’s military, at 900,000 active duty troops and two million reservists, is eight times the size of Ukraine’s. Russia has advanced fighter planes, a formidable navy and marines capable of multiple amphibious landings…
In January, Foreign Policy published an assessment by two policy analysts at the Rand Corporation stating that US weapon shipments to Ukraine, specifically anti-tank missiles, would not alter the outcome of a war with Russia. Given that all experts agree that whatever setbacks the Russians may be suffering, the outcome of the war is inevitable, shipping weapons into the war zone and prolonging the conflict is morally reprehensible. What purpose can such a policy serve other than to get more people killed and turn Ukraine into a hellscape? The likely reason is that the US and NATO want to weaken Russia over the long term with a protracted guerrilla war, no matter the horrific consequences this would have for the Ukrainians they pretend to care so much about.
Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 23rd, the Jewish controlled media apparatus in the West has whipped up anti-Russian ethnic hatred and war fervor among increasingly unhinged wealthy and aspirational upper middle class segments of American and European society. An atmosphere of grandiosity, hysteria and detachment from reality has permeated mainstream coverage and social media discourse for the last two weeks.
The absurd figure of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a comedian known for homoerotic toilet humor, has been recast as “the great communicator” and even more ridiculously, as a reincarnation of Winston Churchill! Whatever one thinks of the notorious British drunk and warmonger, the comparison is simply preposterous. However reprehensible his policies were, Churchill was known as an acerbic and witty orator who wrote dozens of books over his lifetime on politics, history and military strategy. Zelensky was known for pretending to play the piano with his penis.
This level of derangement and the personality cult of the odious Zelensky are being deliberately cultivated to foster political support for rejecting negotiations with Russia and turning Ukraine into a munitions dump to draw out the conflict. The aim is to bog Russia down in a protracted guerrilla war across half of Ukraine, effectively turning it into another Afghanistan.
In the 1980s the US funded and armed Afghan tribesmen to thwart the Soviet invasion of that country, a move which had disastrous long term results for the entire world. This policy lead to 40 years of near constant civil war in Afghanistan and the spread of Jihadist terrorism globally. According to the US government itself, the funding of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan played a role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which in turn lead to the ruinous 20 year US occupation of Afghanistan in which over 70,000 Afghans and 2,500 American troops were killed, 20,000 Americans troops were wounded, and which cost an estimated $5.8 trillion. Ultimately, the US fled the country last fall, leaving it in the hands of the same Taliban government they had promised to remove from power in 2001. What was the point of it all? So far, no one in US foreign policy circles has been able to answer that question. No one has even bothered to try.
Repeating this policy in the Ukraine would be catastrophic. In addition to the constant threat that the conflict could spiral into World War III, the inevitable result will be death and suffering for Ukrainians and Russians, a refugee crisis for Europe and further economic hardship for Europeans and Americans.
The National Justice Party calls for an immediate end to the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine and an immediate halt to all weapons shipments into the country. If Russian victory is inevitable, as everyone agrees, negotiations with Russia for a peaceful resolution must begin in good faith as soon as possible. Further use of Ukraine as a staging ground for provocations and black ops against Russia must end. The National Justice Party, as outlined in our platform, stands for a peaceful foreign policy and an end to foreign military entanglements.
One of the great pet peeves I have with the Freedom Movement (TM) is the idea that they are fighting against the lockdowns and that they want to go back to normal. In other words, they want 2019 without COVID or the lockdowns. They want a return to a society that was already on the rocks, but didn’t want the personal strain of seeing those rocks before it hit the ship (so to speak). They do not want to see their day-to-day being violated any longer. The longer the protests wore on, the greater the sight they have of society. Of those that mock and those that are mocked. Some of the protestors are still in their cosmopolitan bubble, still out and about but with a few barriers here and there. Others have braved hundreds or thousands of miles only to be abused by police, beaten and manhandled by police and assaulted with strange devices (LRADs I believe it is) with little to no accountability from the government or the law as well as insults from the vaccinated public and from talking heads. The freedom protests insist that there has to be a change within the system and that if the system relents and abolishes the mandates, then it is over. This idea, after some consideration, is retarded on every scale imaginable.
These people insist that the system can be changed for the better, hence the desire for the UAP or AUS1 Party or any other party to win seats/and or government. The UAP, with 80,000 members and candidates slated for every House and Senate seat available, would show off the best chance but it would also be catastrophic once it is blown out of the water (and I believe it will be). Any person who insists that abolishing the mandates should be the goal is either a grifting liar or a hopeful dreamer yet to face reality. Understand that if you wind everything back to what it was in 2018 or 2015, back when everything was “sensible”, the people who took two years of your life will still have their jobs, their power and their money. Many insist on a Bill of Rights or trials for the culprits, all within the system obviously, but both ideals are farcical. Please observe the United States, where over 100 cities burned because one black man overdosed on fetanyl while the footage of such an event was edited, the trial was screwed up and the mobs were ready to burn if Derek Chauvin came out of it a free man. I have made this observation and many others have, regarding the United States: If every Amendment has been nullified or altered in its interpretation or in its execution, then threats regarding the Second Amendment are pointless. Hell, the 2A was altered courtesy of the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, the Gun Control Act 1968 and other laws (including the ban on bump stocks courtesy of Donald Trump). As for trials, there is neither the emphasis nor the condemnation needed for such an act. This doesn’t include the constant call to remain nonviolent as the state police use as many immoral tactics as it so wishes. Yes there is talk of all of this, but the Freedom Movement insists that by doing this it will end the struggle. That they can go home and enjoy a world circa-2015.
But they can’t. Too many years have been lost. Too many people have come and gone with the same message only to be damned. Pauline Hanson in the 1990s, Cory Bernardi and Fraser Anning are a few examples. The system could be wound back, but the people who profit from the mandates and goaded the population to take the vaccine, they would still be around. They would have billions of dollars to lobby the hell out of any government that dared to take its foot off the pedal and dared to take its eye from the Great Reset. Any Freedom Movement person that watches the “celebrities” such as Monica Smit, Aussie Cossack and Avi Yemeni should know that they are all grifters. Smit recieved $350,000 for 28 days’ jail, yet men like Thomas Sewell spend 7 months in solitary and receive nothing but contempt from those that would protest against the system. Aussie Cossack is a known foreign agent, having participated in events to usher in pro-Russian sentiment into Australia, yet he is running for a seat in the New South Wales Parliament. When confronted about his past, Cossack tried to intimidate the young man who simply wanted him to name the people responsible for our quandry: The Jew.
His pro-Russia shilling has become all the more apparent given the anti-White conflict in the Ukraine. As for Avi Yemeni, asides from being a former IDF soldier and a convicted wife-basher, he makes his way through every far-right movement and protest group and screws with it. The 2017 protests for South African Farm Attacks, the Australian Liberty Alliance (later called Yellow Vests Australia) and now this movement. The leaders all want their struggle and their comfort uninterrupted. They will urge for change but when things need to be said, they shut it down. Speaking of, I’ll need to say a few things.
What if the movement fails? 99 out of 100 protestors hope that the coming elections prove to them that the mood is changing: SA election in March, Federal between May or September and Victoria in November. Of course, we are hearing that mandates are rolling back or they are dropping in some cases, but they assure us that it has nothing to do with the protests whatsoever. No no, not at all. So, what happens when the Freedom Movements fail? Do you wait until May-September 2025 to get rid of a third-term Scomo or first time Albo? Many people are suffering now, they are suffering because they have been cast away from relationships and networks that they have built with their lives. They have been pushed over the line where they are regarded by the police as trouble and by online lurkers as filthy scum. How many can believe in reforming the system when the system gives nothing to them. It does not give back to those who have worked for their lives and it does not give to their children at all. Many march on the streets yearning for a life that is now manufactured, decadent and fake. The true Australians, the White Australians born and bred here, are found where they do not listen to mindless drivel and instead focus on outlasting the system by refusing the jab, boycotting the TV and divorcing themselves from anything that tells them that they are scum. This is not what our ancestors died for. They did not die so that we become slaves. They died free men and free women, forging their own destiny without a leviathan of fake and gay drivel. We must emancipate ourselves from the society that is no longer ours. This society is expedient, consumerist, decadent, degenerate, feeble, overgrown and ever-consuming. All due to a bastardisation of the White Australia Policy, protectionism, our racial spirit, the nuclear family and our soil, courtesy of the Jews.
So, come this Federal Election, vote for whoever you want. Because it means nothing. Get out as quick as possible. Divorce yourself from the banking system that will shut or freeze accounts like that in Canada. If you have land in the country with good soil and water, then that will be all good. Many people are going to see Scomo or Albo as their Prime Minister by the end of the year. Either way is pretty gay, we’ll say that much about it. Tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands will see their work crushed overnight. Boomers will have no idea what to do and neither will the youth. As for those who prepare to divorce ourselves, well, we’ll have the idea by then.
The term Wolf Warrior comes the Chinese movie of the same name. The second movie in the franchise, Wolf Warrior 2 is the highest grossing movie in China ever. A third movie, Wolf Warrior III is currently in development. The first two movies are standard action movies, the only difference between the movies we’ve seen and these is that the heroes in these are Chinese.
Over the past decade China’s diplomacy has changed, from the 1970’s China had made efforts to fit more into the established international order. Now China wants the international order to fit in with what it wants. This change in emphasis has come to be called Wolf Warrior Diplomacy. A more aggressive and uncompromising attitude to diplomacy and I think a more traditionally Chinese approach to how it sees its place in the world.
The word China means ‘the middle kingdom’ and traditionally that meant that China was at the centre of the world and everything revolved around it. China was quite literally in the middle. All other countries and people were on the outside. China may not have set out to conquer the world, but at the same time it did consider itself superior to everyone else. Which meant that it expected that other countries, all other countries, pay tribute. By tribute I mean pay money or give other goods to China for free, in exchange for a friendly relationship.
I think that China has returned to that way of thinking, to the idea that China is the centre of the world and that the rest of the world should revolve around them. In theory the current international order is built upon the idea that all countries are equal. But at the same time that the great powers are greater and can do things that lesser powers cannot do. China now regards itself as a great power, as do most other countries. But for China that does not mean joining the international order as a great power, instead it means that as a great power it can transform the international order.
China can return to being the middle kingdom.
One of the interesting things about modern China is that while most acknowledge its power and wealth, that does not seem to translate into respect. The only friend it has in the world is North Korea. Certainly it has good relations with other countries, but when the chips are down and China needs sincere friendship who else could it rely on?
The truth is that Chinese diplomacy is linked to its economic success and that success has often been ruthless. It promises friendship and traps countries into debt. It threatens its neighbours on a regular basis. Which I believe comes down to a series of questions that China and the world ask but to which there are no easy answers, such as:
Is China a rich country or a poor country?
Is China a strong country or a weak country?
Is China stable or unstable?
The thing is that all of these points are true at the same time, China is both rich and poor, stable and unstable, strong and weak. Because it has not developed the same all over the country at the same time. It is unequal and in some ways bizarrely unequal. Just to give one example, there is very little of a social safety net because they just cannot afford it. I roll my eyes whenever I see a story about China developing a new reserve currency for the world, a rival to the US dollar. Because the reason the US dollar is the worlds reserve currency is not simply America’s wealth and military might. It is because property rights are respected in the United States. Certainly there have been times in recent decades when property rights have been usurped, But those have not affected the vast majority of people and nearly everyone can still trust that their property is protected. In China that is not true in the slightest.
I remember having a boss who had married a Chinese women, she had been successful in China and she had given it all up to move to Australia. Her husband who liked money, found it hard to believe that she would give it all up. But as she explained, in China you own things because you’re allowed to and once they take away their permission then everything that you thought you owned is taken from you. Nothing is secure.
That is also how China views things on the international stage. That it is China’s right to give and to take away. If China continues on its current course then it seems that some kind of confrontation will occur. The West’s view that every country is sovereign and equal and China’s view that it is the centre of the world will be hard to reconcile.
China is still very poor – 20 minutes long.
Originally published at Upon Hope. You can find Mark’s Subscribestar here.
As a teenager I spent my lunch breaks reading encyclopedias and atlases, so I was more informed than most about geography and world populations. Nothing prepared me for actually landing in Jakarta on the way to Europe for the first time and suddenly realising that Australia and the West in general is just a tiny population in a sea of nonwhites. How many Australians are aware that Indonesia has 273 million people? 10 times more, and that is just one country.
White majority countries make up just 14% of the world’s population. When you subtract the nonwhite populations we only make up 8 to 10% and have an ageing population.
China has 1.43 billion people and makes up 18.47% of the world’s population.
India has 1.38 billion people and makes up 17.70% of the world’s population.
USA has 331 million people and makes up just 4.25% of the world’s population.
Indonesia has 273 million people and makes up 3.51% of the world’s population.
Way down the list is Australia with 25 million people and we make up just 0.33% of the of the world’s population.
As Mark Moncrieff explained White people are a very fair, honorable and morally driven people. Most White people have no idea how vulnerable we are as a group and instead they have been beaten down with “white guilt” by establishment propaganda. The only way we can motivate our people to mentally challenge their mainstream paradigm is to stimulate their survival instinct.
Once our people go into survival mode they become motivated to save themselves and the rest of us. Years of antiwhite propaganda is forgotten and plans are made to form community and activism.
Black on White rape, murder and crime statistics do not motivate even women to care about our people because they rationalise that it won’t affect them. The only time the survival instinct kicks in is when war, death or extinction becomes imminent.
The lying fake news media has moved on from covid fear porn to nuclear war fear porn. Now is a good time to piggyback on their fear momentum and tell the truth about White Genocide. The short White Genocide mantra is very simple and effective to use on both antiwhites and White positive people. Copy and past or make stickers, flyers or memes containing the following text. Call talk back radio and read the mantra on air. Call up John Laws and don’t let that antiwhite boomer bully you:
White people make up just 8% of the global population so if you flood all White majority countries with millions of nonwhites and assimilate us with Diversity programs you permanently eliminate White children forever. There will still be a billion Africans in Africa, a billion Indians in India and 2 billion Asians in Asia. ‘Diversity’ is just a code word for White Genocide.
In some internet chat groups or social media platforms you will have to take off the last sentence to prevent your comment from being blocked by the algorithm. The word ‘Multiculturalism’ is interchangeable with ‘Diversity’ so use which ever one best suits the situation.
Whenever you are engaged by an antiwhite who doesn’t like you pointing out the situation. Post the following text or read it out to them:
All peoples have the right to exist and preserve their race and culture and nobody has the right to harm, exploit, erase or genocide any other group. If you flood all White majority countries with nonwhites and assimilate us with ‘Diversity’ programs you permanently eliminate White children forever. There will still be a billion Africans in Africa, a billion Indians in India and 2 billion Asians in Asia. “Diversity” is just a code word for White Genocide.
Repetition is good. Only call morally bankrupt people who object ‘antiwhites’ and don’t let them change the topic.
If they pretend to be aboriginal or say we deserve erasure because of settlement; post the following:
Aboriginals make up just 3.3% of Australia’s population so when you flood Australia with nonwhites and assimilate us with ‘Diversity’ programs to eliminate White children, you actually erase aboriginals first. Is your hate for White children stronger than your love for aboriginals? Are aboriginals just collateral damage to you sick morally bankrupt antiwhites?
Perceiving lies and falsehoods in the external world is the state of almost right. Being fully right involves using that perception to discover personal spiritual truths, which inevitably involves thinking, decision-making, and, perhaps, action.
Contrary to what my detractors accuse me of, I am not on the side of Russia. Putin is not my hero. God is my hero. I put no hopes in the efforts of men to save us from ourselves. That work is up to each and every one of us within the context of our individual lives.
Recent events are helping to peel back the curtain on the world of lies. But is it enough to sit on the sidelines and gloat for our enemies to fail? Or to hope that the cards fall in an order which will be advantageous to us? I would offer that such indulgences are very much of this world.
The question is what will our awareness of the truth propel us to do? It is possible that being aware of the falsehoods but not acting upon them is very much worse than not seeing through the lies to begin with. It is very easy at moments like these to fall into the gigantic trap of pride. To congratulate oneself on one’s very brilliance at not falling for the simple misdirections that have ensnared so many other lesser men.
Acting does not mean going out and screaming from the rooftops. Or marching down the street in grim determination to face head on the enemy. Positive action begins with oneself, in private, without seeking the acclaim of one’s fellow man. We have just entered the period of Lent, which in the Christian tradition is a time of abstinence and hardship. Of fasting and prayer. It is an opportunity to act in a manner that is pleasing to God.
It is no coincidence that the beginning of Lent has fallen in the first days of Russia’s war with Ukraine and NATO. We are tasked by God to endure hardship and suffering and by passing through such trials we mature in spirit. So many of us are rich in material things. We enjoy lives of ease and our burdens are light. But our spiritual growth is pitiful. And in the end, the literal end, that is the only growth which shall count.
Thus the hardships that we suffer are God’s way of helping us to achieve spiritual growth so that we may be prepared for what comes next. But wouldn’t it be better if we could motivate ourselves to do this without God having to throw burdens in our path. How much more meaningful would such self-determined spiritual growth be?
Berger is entirely correct in his gentle questioning. We must observe the travails of the world with careful detachment, while using what is revealed to learn and also perhaps to help others make their own steps on their individual journeys. We do not shy away from the challenges of our time; we are not cowards. But we must cultivate the spiritual discernment necessary to always stay one step ahead of the Enemy, who is so talented at using our own follies against us.
Internationally renowned human rights lawyers who represented the family of George Floyd will file an urgent appeal to the United Nations as part of a coalition, on behalf of black refugees facing racism at Ukraine’s borders.
Ben Crump and Jasmine Rand will hold a virtual news conference on Wednesday afternoon to announce the petition to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
Peter Herbert, one of the first black judges in Britain and co-chair of the Bandung Conference, is part of the coalition of lawyers and activists, along with Jamaican MP G Anthony Hylton, solicitor Jacqueline McKenzie, and Carlos Moore, president of the National Bar Association in the US.
Speaking to The Independent, Mr Herbert said: “The quality of any nation must be judged by how it respects all its citizens as well as those lawfully present in its borders to work, visit or study.
“Freedom rights should not be subject to racism whatever the circumstances. Russia also has a duty to safeguard the lives and liberty of all citizens irrespective of their ethnicity or nationality.”
The appeal comes after both the Ukrainian government and the UN acknowledged that some refugees had been subjected to discriminatory treatment while trying to flee to safety at Ukraine’s borders, after their experiences were dismissed as lies and “Russian disinformation” by online commentators…
Polish racism at the border?
Ask these 3 Nigerian students who I last night drove to safety what they think of Polish hospitality 🇵🇱❤️
Video evidence has circulated on social media of physical violence and segregation being employed by some Ukraine military officials to prevent black and brown refugees from fleeing the war-torn European country.
Some reports allege that Polish authorities are threatening to shoot black refugees, and segregating the refugee lines to enter Poland based on race.
Who cares if it’s true or not? I could drone on about based Eastern Europeans, or the new colonialism of disciples of woke who are determined to spread their chaotic ideology to every corner of the globe. That isn’t even the point.
Tens of thousands of Asians and Africans were happily living in Ukraine – they belonged. But when they fled Russia’s war, Ukrainians turned on them. My story from the Polish border, with photos by @nataliekeyssarhttps://t.co/tZhATvhb7S
“We all feel the strange side of being Black, because we are always treated differently,” Abraham Emmanual Oluwafemi says. “Most Africans want to evacuate, mostly to Poland. … It’s so scary and tiring.”https://t.co/ne4oCQplvi
International students have been pushed from border to border by #Polish authorities ! They are being denied entry into #Poland !! I am so disgusted !!
Think about it. A refugee is by definition a coward. A refugee is someone who fled their home country because of war, political oppression, etc. Similarly, migrants come to the West not to be mutually enriched by a sharing of cultures, but for economic benefit.
What’s the first thing these people are going to do when the enemy’s tanks come rolling down the Eastern Freeway?
They’ll be on the first train outta here. Thus we see the self-contradictory logic of Australia’s post-war leadership who urged Australia to “populate or perish”, a slogan used as a pretext for mass non-British immigration. We imported millions of people who will never fight for Australia if the chips are really down and who undermined the ethnic make-up and cultural fabric of the nation.
A nation can survive devastating war, but not the slow dilution of its blood and the steady crushing of its spirit. Thus the genius of war. It removes the two primary factors our governments exploit to attract non-Whites to replace us – safety and material comfort – and is guaranteed to send them fleeing.
In addition to emptying your country of foreigners, there are other benefits to war. It means that all the ugly modern buildings will get blown up and you can build something beautiful over the rubble.
huge explosion at city administration building in kharkov (confirmed), it’s being reported that the azov battalion had set up a recruiting station there (unconfirmed) pic.twitter.com/g6Qz86cavA
— Russians With Attitude (@RWApodcast) March 1, 2022
Admittedly, those buildings in the Ukraine are quite stately, but look at the aftermath of one of these bombs.
The Ministry of State Special Communications of Ukraine reported that 2 Russian cruise missiles hit the headquarters of the “territorial defense” in Kharkov. pic.twitter.com/NRajdR0Wk9
— ASB News / MILITARY〽️ (@ASBMilitary) March 3, 2022
One of my bugbears in Melbourne is Wilson Hall at Melbourne University. Here are before and after photos.
Wilson Hall before jews.Wilson Hall after jews.
If the Chinese keep sailing after taking Taiwan, I propose we make Wilson Hall a fuel dump. While we’re at it, we could put a great big communications tower on the Baillieu Library.
What even is this?
The kids would love it too. Currently, education in the West consists of being taught by angry feminists how to use dildos and being manipulated into mutilating their genitals. Losing a limb or two in battle is positively rosy by comparison. Readers at this point may be checking to see if I have categorised this piece as “poorly labelled satire”. I have not. I am at least half serious here. Child soldiers in the Congo have better life prospects than any White kid in a public school in the modern West.
And there’s more. Women would very quickly drop any notion of feminism or equality, and would very happily exchange fighting on the front lines for cooking, cleaning, and looking after the children they would be eager to produce to ensure their own personal protector and provider. With no Big Daddy government to look after them, traditional femininity would be highly sought after.
Finally, men would by far benefit the most. MRA’s may counter that men are the prime victims of war. Well duh. But remember my comments from a few days ago:
“I have a theory that a big part of the reason many Japanese men hide away in their bedrooms and Germany is being literally gang raped by diversity is because both countries foreswore military aggression after World War 2. If you’re not allowed to defend your women and children, what is the point of being a man? It’s no wonder they’re not bothering to turn up to life.”
One of the primary activities men who hide away from life because they’re not allowed to go to war engage in, aside from porn use, is computer games. What do you think they get to do in computer games?
They get to go to war, or otherwise just kill things and blow stuff up.
They get to do the things they’re not allowed to do in real life. Even chess is just two armies lined up against each other. The takeaway from this is that you either allow men the opportunity to be slaughtered, maimed or horribly disfigured in combat for God, King and Country, or they give up and play make-believe.
Furthermore, aside from war, one of the most popular computer game genres are building games. Whether in Minecraft, Sim City or Civilisation, you get to build beautiful new buildings on the rubble of the horrible ugly modern architecture which got blown up by Chinese guided missiles.
XYZ News recently republished an excellent article by Mark Moncrieff who argued that we could pay foreigners to leave Australia. War is a vastly superior policy, as it incentivises foreigners to flee, and with the money saved we can buy cool new weapons.
The point is that modernity is soul crushing. It makes life not worth living. I think a reason why civilisations, according to Glubb have an average lifespan of 250 years is that the women get out of control and the men just get bored. There is literally no downside to war, particularly for a society which has industrialised the ritual sacrifice of babies.
It’s a dark day for Australia. We have lost one of our icons. He was the greatest cricketer since Donald Bradman.
Shane Warne has died of a heart attack while holidaying with friends on an island in Thailand. He was 52. His death came just one day after the death by heart attack of Rod Marsh, former Australian wicket keeper and icon of Australian cricket in the 70’s and 80’s.
Shane Warne will be remembered for revolutionising the game, for his pivotal role in Australia’s dominance of cricket in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, and for that ball.
Nobody who saw that ball live, including Mike Gatting but aside from Richie Benaud, could quite believe he’d been bowled until we’d watched the replay several times. Watching a video of Warne’s top 50 wickets you soon realise it was no fluke.
Let’s speak plainly. Shane Warne was not perfect. He recently allowed himself to become a tool of the cabal, urging everyone to get double-jabbed.
The fact that two former cricketers have died of a heart attack in two days, in a period when so many current sportsmen are dying or being seriously injured by heart ailments due to the dangerous Covid “vaccines” is deeply suspicious and it should be investigated, although it probably never will.
However, like Sampson and King David, Shane Warne had a weakness for women and he partied hard. Of all the former Aussie cricketers, Shane Warne was the most likely to die of a heart attack while on a holiday in Thailand.
Even before his death, Warne paid the ultimate price for living the hedonistic lifestyle normalised during the Cultural Revolution of the 60’s and 70’s which overturned several millennia of Christian tradition and morality. On the 2005 Ashes tour his affairs caught up with him and cost him his marriage.
In a recent documentary on Shane Warne, he states that he retired to spend more time with his children, and I believe him. He understood the consequences of his actions and gave away the opportunity to take 1000 wickets to be a better father. His kids adored him. This tragedy will hit them hardest.
We can blame the not-vaccine or the hard living for his heart attack, but we could also blame a broken heart. Contrary to decades of social engineering programming, hearts never heal. There is a reason divorce is a sin.
I want to talk about what Shane Warne represented.
In a healthy country, sport should just be what we do on the weekend, while also providing part of the cultural glue which ties the nation together. In an unhealthy society, sports stars are elevated to the status of demigods, and both the athletes and the nation lose their connection to the community and ethnic identity at the heart of sport and chase success and glory at all costs.
Before World War 2 cricket fulfilled a healthy role in Australia. Think about the meaning of “the Ashes”. Australia sent a cricket team over to England and beat them. The English were so gutted at being defeated by their colonists, toward whom they always felt superior, that they burnt the stumps.
In competing for these Ashes every couple of years, we Australians and English ritualise the process by which Australia became its own country with its own people and its own identity, while always honouring our British heritage. We compete so hard in the Ashes because our British heritage matters so much.
The Australian cricket team was the last stand of implicit Whiteness for Australia. It was full of mostly alpha Anglos who bullied the rest of the world into submission. It did so during a period in which the Cultural Marxists were consolidating decades of institutional dominance to create the springboard of woke horror which has been unleashed since 2000. Batsmen are now “batters”, the Ashes is merely “the men’s Ashes”, and Justin Langer was sacked as coach because feelings. This is deliberate cultural desecration.
Simultaneously, the Howard government was pulling its greatest betrayal, presenting itself as the bastion against illegal immigration while opening the floodgates to mass replacement immigration which has transformed our demographics to the point where pureblooded Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Australians are likely now a minority in our own country.
Thus our cricketing dominance of the early 2000’s was a great distraction from the fact that our country was being given away, and we were sowing the seeds of our own destruction through our own vanity.
Thus Warnie’s life reflects the glory and the downfall of all Australians. I will forever be grateful for the memories, and he will serve as a spur:
Breitbart also pioneered the “Democrats are the real racists” talking point. I always knew this would spell trouble for the right, long-term. Because implicit in that “dunk” is the belief that it’s the duty of both parties to root out “racists.” That’s a narrative that should be challenged, not furthered. Screaming “Democrats are the real racists” doesn’t bother leftists; they’re just happy you’ve joined the hunt …
This is spot on and something which we should keep in mind at all times when dealing with these nefarious morons. You don’t engage them on their level because that acknowledges their ideologies as having merit which then gives them authority over you seeing as they are the gatekeepers of their own lunacy.
The classic example of this was the gay marriage time bomb. It was sold as just letting poor innocent homos be able to participate in society. A few years later and the reality is far different as transgender lunatics attempt to destroy children both physically and mentally while getting their parents labeled as domestic terrorists for objecting. But the gay marriage argument was already lost years before when we gave them an inch and stopped outlawing sodomy. Thus it was complicity acknowledged that homos and the homo lifestyles were acceptable. The true reality of homo lifestyles is now being revealed, and degenerate does not even begin to cover it.
Everything that Globohomo pushes needs to be countered in the same manner; none of it is acceptable. So you don’t object to third wave feminism, you cut it off at the beginning. Which once again, we failed to do.
However, at the end of his piece, Cole went into a segue where he challenged Breitbart’s mantra that politics is downstream of culture. According to Cole this cannot possibly be the case since it is the antithesis of “go woke, go broke”.
I’ll make one more point: I think Breitbart inadvertently assisted the rise of woke. His mantra (the “Breitbart Doctrine”), “politics is downstream from culture,” emboldened Hollywood execs, actors, musicians, ad agencies, and corporate PR flacks to think they have way more influence than they actually do. If you tell those half-wits that their movies, TV shows, and commercials alter the course of human events, they’ll act the role.
You do realize that “politics is downstream from culture” is incompatible with “go woke, go broke,” right? They can’t both be correct. If “downstream from culture” were true, the NFL would be doing gangbuster business since it went woke and Gillette would’ve quadrupled its profits with its “shaving tranny” commercials.
But that didn’t happen, because more often than not, pop culture doesn’t set trends, it follows them. Or, to be more precise, it follows perceived trends, as job-insecure network and studio execs scurry around trying to latch onto the “next big thing” (and usually, they get it wrong).
“Go woke, go broke” is indeed wrong but not for the reasons that Cole thinks it is. None of the companies that have aggressively pushed a woke agenda have gone broke, but that’s due to the fact that any publicity is good publicity. The amount of coverage that a company like Gillette received for its woke stance more than made up for any loss of sales from the small cache of men prepared to act on their principles, or even possessing any principles at all.
But even worse is the fact that Cole has no understanding of what culture really is. He thinks that it’s movies, songs and commercials, which is just the kind of superficial understanding of culture that defines your traditional boorish American, (which in an ironic sense means that he is acting true to form based on his culture). A culture is a people. For it is the people who produce the artifacts of a culture. And it is then they who teach and inspire the young to leapfrog them and make better on what their teachers achieved.
And people are bound by blood, not just by geography. Thus we see images of Africans attempting to get assistance while stranded in Ukraine and being aggressively shunned by the locals in favor of people of their own culture, of their own tribe.
Breitbart was absolutely correct when he stated that politics is downstream of culture. The tragedy is that even ten years after his death and with all of the awful gains made by the Left, most people still don’t understand what he was really saying.
People were making videos about how useless face masks were back in early 2020. There was a video of a guy vaping through multiple masks at once and even heavy duty gas mask, and the smoke was just pouring out. Good luck trying to find anything with the YouTube algorithm though. This is all I got from BitChute (skip to the end.)
So, now that Vladimir Putin has cured Covid:
It is safe for the media to do a controlled demolition on another pillar of the Covid Tyranny agenda. We are seeing more and more articles admitting that face masks are useless:
Cloth masks do little to prevent the spread of COVID-19, or other airborne diseases, a new study finds.
Researchers from the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom found that 90 percent of particles could get through cloth masks, making them effectively useless during the pandemic.
Cloth masks have been popular in the U.S., as they are easily reusable after washing and at some points were the most accessible due to shortages and high prices for surgical or N95 masks.
Now, though, experts have discovered that these masks were doing little if anything to actually stop the spread of the virus, and likely contributed to spread as people who believed they were acting safely were not doing so.
The diagram says so.
Researchers, who published their findings Tuesday in Physics of Fluids, built an airflow simulation using 3d imaging to gauge how well different masks used during the pandemic filtered particles.
They note that unlike N95 or surgical masks, cloth masks are not built using material made to filter out particles.
Cloth masks are made out of tightly woven fabrics. While not visible to the eye, small gaps in the fabric are enough to allow for a vast majority of particles to get through.
‘Masks are air filters, and woven fabrics, such as cotton, make for good jeans, shirts, and other apparel, but they are lousy air filters,’ Richard Sear, co-author of the study and physicist at Surrey University, said in a statement.
I wonder if that girl who got choked out by a Victorian police officer in 2020 for not wearing a face mask will ever get an apology.
Like the video shown at the start, research came out almost immediately in 2020 proving exactly this, but they deliberately suppressed it. The number one role of face masks from 2020-2022 has been to spread mass compliance among the population. Face masks reduce individuality and signify your status as a slave to the propaganda. They automatically out-group anybody who dissents from the Narrative because the evidence is literally right there on your face.
The sting in the tail is that they just might mandate an even more awful version of the face mask:
KN95 masks are built to filter out particles, and have a standard filtration of 95 percent.
‘The filtering layer of an N95 mask is made from much smaller, 5-micrometer fibers with gaps that are 10 times smaller, making it much better for filtering nasty particles from the air, such as those containing virus,’ Sear said.
KF-94 masks are considered to be very effective as well, with the ability to filter out 94 percent of particles.
The globalists are likely just taking a step back. They’re taking a break. They’ll be back, and when they come back they will hit much harder. We cannot comply our way out of this.
Western nations and their lapdog allies are falling over themselves to impose the most ridiculous sanctions on Russia. The high point, or low point depending on your point of view, would probably have to be the international council that judges pedigree cats which booted out Russia in a tumultuous display of feline ferocity. The competition’s organisers for one brief moment made themselves newsworthy.
