Originally published at National Justice on September 26, 2020.
In recent years, Jews and Western elites have been subject to popular accusations about their secret desire to molest or hurt children.
The Q-Anon movement — largely embraced by older conservatives — is the greatest embodiment of this tendency. Q Anon is not “anti-Semitic,” nor is it on its face threatening to the actual power structure, yet prominent Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League have prioritized its suppression online.
While Q fans often occupy their time chasing wild geese and steer clear of confrontations with Jewish power, Jewish-funded Genocide Watch president Gregory Stanton recently took to the airwaves condemning the impulse of the misguided pedophile-hunters as “Nazism” and “anti-Semitism” — an accusation conspiracy theorists received with confusion and anger.
With the exception of generic and individualized implications of George Soros and the Rothschilds, there is no obvious reason for the Jewish community to find the silliness of Q-Anon to be a potential challenge.
But a deeper study into the post-war Jewish consensus (domestic liberal maximalism, suppressing Gentile authoritarianism), as well as what appears to be Jewish-led institutional preparations to make pedophilia the next barrier to break down in the sexual revolution, goes a long way in explaining the concern.
Authoritarians, Jews and Pedophiles
Numerous studies have found a powerful link between personalities that score high on the “authoritarian” scale (dislike of change, valuing stability and order, anti-cosmopolitan attitudes) and the desire to punish child molestation.
Jewish scholars have specifically singled out the “authoritarian” segments of a given population as embodying a dormant Fascism — an unconscious and potentially anti-Semitic cell that can be rapidly awakened and mobilized in a wide variety of social-historical contexts.
The Frankfurt School, Wilhelm Reich, and various Jewish social scientists to this day have dedicated much of their professional careers seeking ways to identify and deconstruct the social forces that breed authoritarian collectives and their desire to resist multiculturalism, sexual license, hyper-individualism, and even wealth inequality. The desire of Jews to prevent the rise of another Hitler underlines the “anti-fascist” creed that books like R.R. Reno’s Return of the Strong Gods have demonstrated underpins the ruling post-war American ideology.
The “repression” of infantile sexuality, according to Jews who studied the rise of Fascism, is the most consistent predictor of authoritarian tendencies. Using Freud’s widely debunked Oedipus Complex, historic anti-fascists purport that exposing small children to sexuality is the key to immunizing them from the appeal of Fascist ideas when they become adults.
Wilhelm Reich’s highly influential 1933 frontal attack on both German Nationalsocialism and the USSR under Stalin stated this explicitly:
Suppression of the natural sexuality of the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, “good” and “adjusted” in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety.
Reich’s book, in non-ideological terms, observes that a strong and united heterosexual family unit that instills moral values in its children and shields them from pre-pubescent sexual experiences creates the building blocks for organic community and social harmony that populists can later “exploit.”
Sexual repression and anti-Semitism –populist opposition to unfair and destructive concentrations of Jewish power — thus walk hand-in-hand.
Reich’s communist past and seeming endorsement of sex with children enabled by the destruction of the family was not well-received during his time. While the story of the Jewish Marxist being driven out of the Third Reich and his books burned is often featured in “Holocaust” and liberal lore, less known is the fact that he was constantly harangued by the US government during the 1950s, culminating in a federal court ordering his books be burned again.
A slightly watered down and updated version of Reich’s theories were developed undisturbed by the American Jewish Committee in 1950 — The Authoritarian Personality by Theodore Adorno, Else Frenkel, Daniel Levinson and others.
Adorno et al drew from Freudian infantile sexuality theory, but did not go so far as to outright endorse molesting children to prevent Fascism. Instead, the compromise for reducing the number of individuals rating high on the “F-scale” (Fascism) was prescriptions to undermine traditional Western concepts of the family (such as through feminism), end corporal punishment, and promote sexual depravity (homosexuality, transgenderism, etc) more aggressively.
Theories by Adorno and Reich remain the broad consensus among today’s academy. The rise of white populism in Western countries and some non-Western countries has largely been contained by Jewish organizations, but with this has come a renewed interest in not just studying the phenomenon from the perspective of it being a perverted “threat to democracy,” as Yascha Mounk’s The People vs. Democracy contends, but also in accelerating social-liberal anti-social trends ahead of schedule.
The 1960s: Gay Rights and Pedophilia
Advocacy for legalizing pedophilia is nothing new in post-war Western nations. Influential Jewish and homosexual intellectual and cultural leaders like Allen Ginsburg, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Hakim Bey, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Gabriel Matzneff, et al –fueled by Jewish anti-fascist hysterics and the theories of Reich, Freud, and Adorno — openly promoted sex with small children as an act of liberation — unimaginable in 2020.
Groups like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) were generally accepted as fellow travelers in the “LGBT” movement of its time and were members of mainstream gay advocacy organizations like the International Gay and Lesbian Alliance (ILGA). In the UK, the Pedophile Informational Exchange was also involved with gay activism. The Netherlands, France, Germany and other liberal states all had parallel above-ground groups dedicated to lowering or abolishing the age of consent, sometimes embraced by mainstream political organizations like the German Green Party (which for years was represented by Daniel-Cohn Bendit in the European Parliament).
The reaction was delayed, but it came. By the 1980s a social conservative wave took hold in the United States, expressed by the landslide election of Ronald Reagan and his Christian supporters, sparked in part by the AIDS epidemic and disquietude with the sexual revolution in the 1960s and 70s.
By the 90s, the LGBT movement began to strategically distance itself from pedophiles, understanding that during their initial shot for “queer liberation,” the then settled science linking homosexuality with pedophilia and other anti-social behaviors (as paraphilia) was the 8-ball that set them back — thanks to groups like Anita Bryant’s Save Our Children movement founded in 1977 — as much as AIDS.
The Pro-Pedophile Revival
As with other once aberrant movements now dominant in American life (critical race theory, LGBT, etc) the seeds for pedophile activism are being planted by homosexual and Jewish figures.
While “authoritarians” often appear paranoid or hysterical in their hunt for pedophiles in Wayfair cabinets, their concern is not unfounded.
The recent 6-3 decision by the conservative majority Supreme Court to add “transgender” sexual deviants to the category of federally protected minority was a massive victory for the well-funded but unpopular transsexual movement. With figures such as Lady MAGA now receiving red carpet treatment in “respectable” conservative circles, it’s clear that America’s institutional individualistic right-liberals are not only surrendering opposition to the barbaric practice of surgically and chemically trying to change a child’s sex, it doesn’t even have the moral or intellectual categories needed to confidently fight the trend to begin with.
It’s no coincidence that concerns about pedophile-normalization have now hit a crescendo in the wake of mainstream Christians and the Republican Party utterly failing to stop the Jewish funded transsexual movement.
The revival of the pedophile-acceptance movement is currently being led by organizations such as B4U ACT.
B4U-ACT, founded in 2003 by the Jew Michael F. Melsheimer, states on its website that its mission is to provide mental health services to individuals who express sexual desire for children.
In practice, B4U-ACT has been at the forefront of attempting to erase social boundaries and stigmas related to pedophilia through a top-down coup.
The American Psychological Association (APA) removing homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses in 1973 under activist pressure is widely accepted as the turning point for the mainstreaming of homosexuality.
Individuals at B4U-ACT are mirroring this strategy. A symposium hosted by the organization in 2011 called for pressuring the APA to reclassify pedophilia as a non-criminal “sexual orientation” and begin using the politically correct term Minor Attracted Person (MAP) in the interest of tolerance. Observers noted that the conference seemed to be aimed at deliberately obfuscating right and wrong in respects to the act of abusing children.
The event was attended and supported almost entirely by Jews. Speakers included B4U-ACT director Dr. Richard Kramer, Johns Hopkins University director of the Sexual Behavior Consultation Unit Frederick Saul Berlin and London School of Economics professor of Gender and Sexuality Jacob Breslow.
B4U-ACT was initially successful. The 2013 update to the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) subsequently reclassified pedophilia as a mere sexual orientation. When vigilant Christian groups like the American Family Association led an outraged protest, the APA retracted the edition and claimed it was an accident.
A number of attempts by the mainstream media to “meme” the concept of a “virtuous pedophile” — a concept invented and pioneered by another pro-pedophile group The Global Prevention Project — such as Salon’s Todd Nickerson articles or “documentaries” like I, Pedophile have not been well-received.
Yet in spite of this, pedophiles seeking to politically organize caught a big break in 2018, when Canadian-Jew and homosexual activist Dr. James Cantor wrote a letter to Twitter’s Trust & Safety Department demanding that the company allow its platform to become the home of “MAPS” looking to network with one another without getting banned. Today it is common to see self-described open pedophiles on Twitter, often sporting their own rainbow sexual identitarian flag.
Pedophile advocacy on the left — specifically in anarchist and “gay liberation” circles — has also started to make inroads in recent years. Radical leftist Derrick Jensen’s 2019 book Anarchism and the Politics of Violation, which brought attention to the fact that the founders of “Queer Theory” and transgenderism (Jews such as Judith Butler and Gayle Rubin) were also advocates of pedophilia, was pulled before publication by the Penguin-Random House imprint, Seven Stories Books.
Jensen’s “cancellation,” including his ban from Youtube, was the response his critiques met by a hardening consensus in academic and leftist circles in support of “marginalized” pedosexuals.
Hakim Bey, once discredited in left-wing circles for his NAMBLA membership and advocacy for child rape, has re-emerged in recent years as the principle inspiration for CHAZ in Seattle.
Various “hipster” left-liberal publications aggressively promote Sophie Lewis, a Jewish leftist who calls for the forced abolition of the family in the interest of “queer children.” Wealthy Brooklyn Socialite and Jacobin Magazine fixture Liza Featherstone has been repeatedly criticized for what many perceive to apologetic discourse in respects to pedophilia.
It is clear to any neutral observer that this is about to become a problem. While many cannot articulate it, the collective unconscious can feel it.
Q-Anon and other Trump-aligned movements serve as a perfect foil to begin turning universal moral opposition to abusing kids into another controlled culture war conflict the right is bound to lose.
In the Jewish calculation, the trauma-induced mistrust of adult authority figures means Fascism and gentile authoritarianism are defeated forever.
As we float into uncharted waters, their theory will be put to the test.
