It happened again.
Here are the key facts:
- Six people have been stabbed at a supermarket in Aukland, New Zealand.
- Three victims are in a critical condition, one is in a serious condition.
- The terrorist was from Sri Lanka.
- The Sri Lankan terrorist was a muslim, “inspired” by the Islamic State.
- The the Sri Lankan muslim terrorist was shot within 60 seconds of starting his rampage.
These first four facts are tragic yet utterly predictable. The fifth opens our first can of worms. Consider this:
Police commissioner Andrew Coster said a surveillance team and a specialist tactics group had followed the man from his home to the supermarket. But while there were concerns about the him, officials said they had no reason to think he was planning an attack on Friday, and the team believed he was going to do his grocery shopping.
After entering the store, however, the attacker got hold of a knife and went on a stabbing spree.
Why was he being surveilled and followed?
The man… arrived in New Zealand in October 2011. He became a person of national security interest in 2016.
He had been under round-the-clock monitoring and heavy surveillance due to concerns about his ideology. He was known to multiple agencies, and was also on a terror watchlist.
Local media reports said the attacker was 32 years old and had recently been sentenced to one year of supervision for possessing IS propaganda.
Prosecutors had accused him of plotting a “lone wolf” terror attack using knives, but the judge ruled that planning a terror attack was not in itself an offence under existing laws, the reports said.
His internet search history and bookmarks included heroes of Isis, Islamic State dress, and New Zealand prison clothes and food, according to Stuff.
Ms Ardern said that until Friday, he had not committed any offence. When asked about the man’s motivations, she said they were “Isis-inspired”.
Questions have been raised about why action against him was not taken before six people were injured – especially since he was under close surveillance.
“The reality is, that when you are surveilling someone on a 24/7 basis, it is not possible to be immediately next to them at all times. The staff intervened as quickly as they could and they prevented further injury in what was a terrifying situation,” said Mr Coster.
This information should force every single person in the entire New Zealand political system, bureaucracy, intelligence service and judicial system to resign in disgrace and to be put on trial for treason. To reiterate:
A judge acknowledged that this Sri Lankan islamic terrorist was actively planning a terrorist attack, yet stated that existing laws did not make this illegal.
This is ludicrous. After Brenton Tarrant allegedly killed 51 people in a mosque the New Zealand and Australian Regimes became obsessed with the non-existent threat of terrorism from ordinary Kiwis and Aussies who just want our countries back. The alleged attack was used as a pretext to disarm the New Zealand population, and White men have served jail time in both countries merely for sharing footage of the incident.
However..
A Sri Lankan muslim actively planned a terrorist attack, and security agencies actually predicted exactly how he would do it, but he was allowed to remain free.
This obsession with the non-existent threat of White terrorism has actively endangered the lives of ordinary people and it could very well cost the lives of ordinary White New Zealanders. Our governments have one job – to keep us safe. Instead they have actively, and knowingly, done exactly the opposite.
This is exactly what Fraser Anning was talking about when he responded to the Christchurch Incident:
“I am utterly opposed to any form of violence within our community, and I totally condemn the actions of the gunman,” he said.
“However, whilst this kind of violent vigilantism can never be justified, what it highlights is the growing fear within our community, both in Australia and New Zealand, of the increasing Muslim presence.”
“As always, left-wing politicians and the media will rush to claim that the causes of today’s shootings lie with gun laws or those who hold nationalist views but this is all clichéd nonsense.”
“The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place.”
“Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators. World-wide, Muslims are killing people in the name of their faith on an industrial scale.”
“The entire religion of Islam is simply the violent ideology of a sixth century despot masquerading as a religious leader, which justifies endless war against anyone who opposes it and calls for the murder of unbelievers and apostates.”
“The truth is that Islam is not like any other faith. It is the religious equivalent of fascism. And just because the followers of this savage belief were not the killers in this instance, does not make them blameless.”
“As we read in Matthew 26:52, ‘all they that take the sword, shall perish by the sword’ and those who follow a violent religion that calls on them to murder us, cannot be too surprised when someone takes them at their word and responds in kind,”
Let’s focus on Anning’s key point:
“The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place.”
Now let’s follow the breadcrumbs:
- The Sri Lankan muslim terrorist arrived to New Zealand as a refugee in 2011.
- In April 2019, Islamic State-inspired Islamic terrorists in Sri Lanka killed 250 and injured thousands, one month after the Christchurch incident, in an attack explicitly aimed at Christians and explicitly meant as “retaliation” for the Christchurch incident.
So, New Zealand counter terrorism authorities kept a close eye on a refugee who shared the same nationality, religion and political affiliation as the people who “retaliated” for the Christchurch Incident, yet could not convict him when he actively planned a terrorist attack in New Zealand.
This 100% proves Fraser Anning’s point.
Furthermore, White people who raise concerns about muslim immigration and islamic terror – indeed the same concerns raised by New Zealand’s counter terrorism agencies – are placed in the same category as the muslims terrorist. This is beyond absurd but it just gets more damning. Consider this analysis:
This callous act in Auckland will stir painful memories of the deadly mosque attacks in Christchurch in 2019.
Given the religious and political motivations of the Sri Lankan muslim terrorist, it is far more appropriate to refer to the painful memories of the Bali Bombings. The Madrid Bombings. The London Bombings. The Nice Truck Attack. The Barcelona Truck Attack.
Or dare I say it, Ebba.
Now let’s look at the most damning evidence:
The man, whose identity cannot be revealed due to court suppression orders..
Also:
“What happened today was despicable, it was hateful it was wrong,” Ms Ardern said in a news conference. “It was carried out by an individual, not a faith.”
When Brenton Tarrant allegedly perpetrated the Christchurch incident his name and face were plastered over every newspaper in the world. His name is brought up as a guilt-by-association trick when referring to any White person who so much as raises a public eyebrow at immigration rates into the West. Tarrant’s awareness of the Great Demographic Replacement of White people has been used explicitly to frame anybody who objects to it as a potential terrorist, and that their words could inspire others to commit terrorism.
The Christchurch Incident is being used as a tool with which to criminalise White people objecting to our own replacement, while the very real threat of islamic terror is downplayed, deflected and enabled by the Regime.
However after the Christchurch Incident, Jacinda Ardern did everything she possibly could to ingratiate herself with muslims in New Zealand.
But after a muslim who was explicitly motivated by islam and by an islamic terrorist organisation attempted to murder New Zealanders, Ardern told her countrymen that he was just some guy.
No standing with the White community.
Nothing.
We’re supposed to just take it. Whenever a foreigner allowed in by our treacherous governments murders our people, we are supposed to maintain our commitment to multiculturalism, to maintain our commitment to our own genocide.
We have no representation. We are a stateless people. The Regimes who have usurped control of our lands want to replace us and they don’t care when our replacements kill us.