Australian National Cabinet Changes Definition of “Close Contact”

2

Here is more evidence that Covid is bioengineered with artificial intelligence:

National cabinet has agreed on what defines a person as a close contact of a COVID-19 case.

Until now, that definition was different in each state and territory.

Because Covid knew to behave differently depending on where it was. It is very culturally sensitive like that.

Now Prime Minister Scott Morrison says a close contact will be someone who has spent four hours or more with a confirmed case in a household or household-like setting, such as a residential care facility.

Those contacts would only be required to quarantine for seven days, and take a rapid antigen test (RAT) on day six.

In your face Mrs “Do not touch that ball” Lady.

He says the new definition would come into effect from Friday in NSW, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and the ACT.

The bioweapon has been engineered to know when the rules change and behave accordingly. And you thought knowing if someone was standing or sitting was smart..

Tasmania will follow on January 1, while the Northern Territory will make announcements about its plans in the coming days.

West Australian Premier Mark McGowan said the state agrees with the changes but that was only relevant for states with thousands of daily cases.

This means Western Australia will continue with its existing close contact and isolation rules for the time being.

That’s okay, because again, the virus knows where it is.

Yesterday, Mr Morrison said: “It is important that we move to a new definition of close contact that enables Australia to keep moving, for people to get on with their lives.”

Most importantly, Covid is intelligent enough to understand that if the government of the “jurisdiction” in which it finds itself defines “close contact” too stringently, given the way that 6 degrees of separation works, it could bring the entire country to a grinding halt with literally everybody needing to self isolate.

In all seriousness, some people have questioned why we need to check in at stores anymore, if a close contact is now defined as having spent 4 hours with a confirmed Covid case. It’s a good point.

However, the government wants to hold on to its power. It wants to keep so-called “casual contacts” on edge and monitoring whether that tickle in the throat is something more serious, while still being able to be good worker drones.

When the government refers to getting the “settings” right, it means it wants to maintain a higher level of micromanagement of people’s everyday lives than what it had pre-2020, while still allowing the economy to stumble on. It sets laws that it knows the majority of people will either follow blindly or enforce on each other without requiring expensive or (too) invasive oversight, while allowing just enough freedom for all its little debt slaves to keep paying off their mortgages.

If the “settings” are too stringent, everything stops. They don’t want that. They want people to think that there is still a way out of this if we all comply.

Subscribe to XYZ on Telegram, Bitchute, Patreon, Twitter and Gab.