Did Someone Just Red Pill the New York Times?


The New York Times, aka. The Opposition Party, aka. Fake News, just did something quite remarkable. They published an opinion piece on Never Trumpers peppered with a few inconvenient truths that they actually frame as inconvenient truths:


“The leaders of the Women’s March, arguably the most prominent feminists in the country, have some chilling ideas and associations. Far from erecting the big tent so many had hoped for, the movement they lead has embraced decidedly illiberal causes and cultivated a radical tenor that seems determined to alienate all but the most woke.”

We see an historic slaying of a few sacred cows. Next they’ll admit that Lena Dunham isn’t funny, Vince Foster received the Frank Underwood treatment, and that people would have preferred cancer of the rectum to the prospect of Hillary Clinton as President. Revenue and distribution must seriously be falling if the New York Times is resorting to something resembling journalistic integrity.

It’s your XYZ.

Photo by James Cridland

Previous articleQuote of the Day: Real Men, We Need You, The Commies Are Back
Next articleA Grumpy Thought: We Dare Triple J To Change The Date
Eh?nonymous was a thoroughly repellent unemployed social justice warrior until a one in a million glitch in his Facebook account affected the algorithms in his news feed, omitting posts from his much loved left leaning Huffington Post and I F---ing Love Science, and inexplicably replacing them with centrist and conservative newsfeed items that slowly dragged him kicking and screaming into the light beyond the safe space that Mr. Zuckerberg had so carefully constructed for him. It’s a long road to recovery, but every Mark Steyn share he sees in his newsfeed is like another day clean from social justice addiction.