Mr Goodes has stood in solidarity with the man, reiterating that cultural practices are simply beyond reproach. In a joint statement with the AFL he announced “It’s simply shameful and unacceptable in this day and age, that tribal and cultural values are being questioned and impeded. This was obviously a racist action directed at the victim, and this needs to stop!”
The victim was unavailable for comment due to legal complications, however XYZ is led to believe that he has filed with the UNHRC and the AFL for victim status.
Adam Goodes wades into Dubai cultural racism debate
Former Australian of the Year Adam Goodes has today strengthened his foreign policy credentials for the Greens ahead of next year’s looming election.
The cultural warrior’s comments were in response to an incident in Dubai, where a man, not unlike Adam Goodes, was singled out for criticism based on his culture. In an unashamed assertion of cultural and tribal practices, the victim in question was harassed by the local authorities and criticised after he physically restrained them from interfering in a cultural matter inappropriately and diminishing the honor of his family.
A man without honour
The Australian reported this morning: that “a man was arrested in Dubai after he fought off lifeguards trying to save his drowning daughter, telling them that he would rather she die than be “dishonoured” by having unknown men touch her.”
Apparently, the girl’s father “wrestled with the lifeguards even as his daughter, 20, screamed for help before slipping beneath the waves.”
Lieutenant-Colonel Ahmed Burqibah, deputy director of the police search and rescue department at Dubai said:
“The father was a tall and strong man. He started pulling and preventing the rescue men and got violent with them. He told them that he prefers his daughter being dead than [to have the dishonour of] being touched by a strange man.”
Of course, this incident has nothing to do with Islam, and as such is isn’t mentioned in the Australian’s report.
The tragedy and pure evil of this story leaves me practically speechless, but I do have one thing to say, and it is about honour.
What kind of man, instead of trying to rescue his daughter from drowning himself, tries to stop other men from rescuing her?
Not a man with honour.
Actually, not a man at all.
Quote of the day – Monday 10 August 2015
Islamic women talking about female genital mutilation and acid attacks
“gives racists more ammunition.”
Oh my Lord.
A rather sad quote of the day for Monday 10 August.
Doctor Killjoy
The wonders of modern science. Is there not a nightly newscast that passes by without some new study into the therapeutic effects of a rare plant growing in a remote region of the Amazon jungle (or insert here equivalent) being earnestly discussed? Or in which the latest study commissioned at great expense to the taxpayer confirms that those who drink four glasses of pineapple juice a day, instead of beer or wine, lower their risk of acquiring dementia later in life by 30% – well great, pass me a beer then. What’s next? That eating one banana a day may reduce my risk of being involved in a fatal car accident? Ever noticed how every story reporting the latest ground-breaking new study in this area features words like “might,” “maybe,” “believe,” “possibly”? in other words, we have no freaking idea either, but it’s getting us air time, and ticking boxes all over our annual grant applications.
Scientists are sort of like clergy in this strange new postmodernist world, so it’s bit like calling your parish priest a dickhead to, well, call the earnest type in the white robe solemnly telling us to eat more bananas, a dickhead. But that’s what I did, watching the latest report on the latest breakthrough scientific study that promised to prolong my life by several years, or prevent the onset of some condition I have never heard of and will probably never acquire, and… you’ve heard the narrative.
And then there are the po-faced doctors, with their thin lips and thick rimmed spectacles, trying to look as natural as they can in the hospital laboratory, or in some waiting room, as they look down the camera and gently advise the average citizen poised in front of their television, waiting for the news to end and this wanker to get off so the Footy show can start… that’s you and me, by the way… that you (me) are fat, if not obese, drink too much, don’t exercise enough, have endangered our grandchildren’s life by smoking as a youth, are too stupid to be let loose anywhere near a McDonalds or KFC, and… by the way… we need quite a bit more of your taxes so we can continue to run adds and appear on the news telling you that you are fat, if not obese, drink too much, don’t exercise enough, and… you get the drift of it.
It used to be that the killjoys and wowsers in white robes were priests. When did they become scientists and doctors? And why does the government listen to these blowhards, just because they can hang a stethoscope around their neck? What makes being a scientist or a doctor any better, or more noble, or more important, than other professions? All things being equal, plumbers and hookers are both inherently more useful occupations.
So punters, share this one if you’ve had enough of scientists and doctors hovering over you like a Death-Eater from the Harry Potter movies, sucking all the joy out of our lives. Show them your petronus. Go on…
The media and room 101
Things they do not want us to see:
1) Waleed Aly being asked his opinions on same sex marriage.
2) The Greens, in company with their Islamic allies, talking about the importance of women’s rights, gay rights, sustainable population (small family), equality.
3) The Greens in company with their cis-gendered friends talking about the importance of Halal, Sharia, honor killings and the beauty of diverse cultural practices and tribal based justice systems.
4) Booing of Adam Goodes.
5) Global non warming.
6) Sharia courts.
7) Aboriginal domestic dysfunction.
8) Unionist and politician rorts and entitlements.
9) National structural deficits.
10) Housing bubbles and the decline of the manufacturing industries.
Oh, there are plenty of other things they want us to see, very selectively filtered and categorised.
Try finding footage of Cathy Freeman at the 2000 Olympics when she was interviewed post-finish line and commented naively “My brothers have never been so happy – and they are not even drunk!”
It didn’t fit the narrative. Our media must not permit reality to get off message.
Adam Goodes crying racist perfectly fits their narrative.
It feels like Room 101 of institutional media political correctness.
Yes Islamophobia hurts, so does Genital Mutilation
On Saturday, a two hundred strong crowd gathered in the Melbourne suburb of Coburg for an Islamophobia forum. But by omitting two widespread violent practices, the Islamophobia Forum placed political point-scoring above honestly addressing the needs of women in Islam.
Nasrin Amin, one of the organisers of the event, told the gathering that “racism hurts.”
The ABC reported yesterday that, “Ms Amin wears a black veil that covers half of her face. She organised the awareness forum in part because of her personal experience, and because of the stories she heard of other Muslim women who have been attacked. Incidents included having their scarves pulled off them, and in one case, a woman had coffee thrown on her.”
I am genuinely sorry to hear that Ms Amin and others have been hurt by the actions of knuckleheads, and I understand that it is invasive and hurtful for people to tug at your clothes and pull your scarves off. Security issues aside, that sort of crass, ill-mannered conduct is not on and I don’t support those actions.
I was however concerned that Ms Amin apparently failed to mention the hurt that many Muslim women feel when they have acid thrown on their face by members of their own community if they don’t cover their faces.
Furthermore, nor did the victims of female genital mutilation get a look in. Only a few days ago, News.com.au reported that authorities have issued warnings as young girls vanish during the “cutting season.” You see every year around this time,
“Thousands of girls disappear from homes and schools for extended holidays never to return the same again.”I recall watching a female member of Victoria Police trying to mobilise school teachers to keep watch for girls who just stop turning up for school – Sometimes the parents will off-handedly explain that their children have gone to visit relatives. The police officer (who specialised in the area) wanted teachers to report it, so the police could watch at airports and educate their Islamic communities – but the sad reality is by the time a teacher notices that a student hasn’t returned after school holidays, most likely the damage has already been done. Despite what some will tell you, this is NOT a minority practice chosen by women old enough to make this decision. Take for example this report of the 2012 NSW court cases, where the girls disfigured were aged Seven, Six, and eighteen months. As the News.com.au article goes on,
“It’s a part of the annual “cutting season” where girls younger than 15 are sent to visit relatives only to have their genitalia mutilated using knives, scissors or pieces of glass and sometimes sewn up using thorns.”The impulse, shared by Ms Amin, to stand up for Islamic women, is a good one. We should be engaged in the needs in our community and the issues of the day. However, the current political push to clamp down on “islamophobia” distorts these needs – and would rather talk about tugging at scarves, than the barbaric disfigurement of between 100 and 140 million women and young girls around the world – the overwhelming majority living under Islam. While I can understand a reaction of horror, followed by an inability to speak and act directly on this issue. So much so that even those against the practice often don’t even speak the words “Female Genital Mutilation” preferring instead the vague euphemism – FGM (somewhat graphic video): I know this is disturbing and graphic but we need to be speaking about this, and a Political-Correctness-cone-of-silence serves nobody. In a similar way, the term ‘Islamophobia,’ quickly becoming a popular catch all slogan, is also terribly imprecise. Outrage at the “cutting off the clitoris to a process known as infibulation — where all external genitalia is removed and two sides of the vulva are sewn together… often done without anaesthetic” is NOT ‘phobia’ – it’s Compassion. Women living under Islam may well need the community mobilised to support them – and forums can be an effective way of engaging allies – but neglecting to speak for women who have acid thrown on their faces, and their genitals mutilated – not only fails to provide support where it is most needed, but disrespectfully uses dis-empowered girls and women as political playthings.
BREAKING NEWS: Kim Jong Un executed for racist booing
BREAKING NEWS: Adam Goodes has just had Kim Jong Un executed by the people’s AFL.
As part of the Multicultural Round, Kim Jong Un attended the recent Geelong – Sydney AFL match.
The formerly Honorable Dear Leader was making sounds and gesturing in a way which, despite his claims of “lost in translation”, were said by Mr Goodes to have made him feel that they were racist in intent.
After a show-trial, as seen in the attached image, Kim Jong Un was found guilty and summarily executed. The Greens have applauded the AFL for their social engineering achievements.
Left at the altar
The Sydney Morning Herald, in its usual shrill tone reported from today’s march for same-sex marriage:
‘Malcolm McPherson is fed up with being left standing at the altar. “I keep turning up for a wedding and each time I get stood up by the Australian government.”‘
A rather ominous picture to come?
I find it interesting Mr McPherson feels stood up by the Australian government.
Although I was always planning to invite God to my nuptials, I was very tempted, and came close to leaving the government out of it.
Political Football
Adam Goodes made a stunning return to the football field in Geelong last night after a week of controversy. In a rare sign of unity, players from both teams held hands and shared what one player described as ‘a special and touching moment’ as the two teams ran through a banner as one. It didn’t take long for the moment everyone inside the ground was waiting for – not to mention the Fairfax and ABC journalists watching eagerly poised at their keyboards, fingers poised over the ‘r’ button. Goodes received the football on the wing, whereupon the heaven’s opened and an angelic choir appeared, singing the Hallelujah chorus, as the fans in the outer wept spontaneous tears of joy. A Channel Seven commentator appeared to have climaxed in the commentary box, and was unable to resume verbal duties until after the quarter time break, at which time cleaners were also summoned.
The head of the United Nations was reported to be pleased that an international incident had been avoided by the good behaviour of the Geelong punters, and later confirmed that Australia could now expect to retain its membership of the UN. In Washington, the President was updated on the situation also. AFL authorities attributed the pleasing crowd behaviour to the strenuous efforts put into the pre-game entertainment. Before the game began, the crowd had been treated to a free re-education session, with repeated notices blasting out over the PA system, and subliminal messages being flashed across the scoreboard, reminding the fans they were racist bigots.
As of today, only a lone Geelong fan, reportedly in the standing area immediately in front of the bar, was believed to have been caught booing. He was taken from the ground and summarily executed.
The ABC of race baiting
Just when you thought things were starting to settle down after the Adam Goodes race saga, ABC ‘journalist’ Liz Foschia thought it would be fun to stoke up the flames of outrage and division.
Foschia was having a nice lunch at Canberra’s Hyatt Hotel on Friday (wow – the ABC’s journalists obviously aren’t doing too bad) and happened to notice a mistake on the menu card.
Rather than discretely alerting the hotel staff about the potentially embarrassing typo as most people would do, Foschia thought it better to let the hotel know, as well as the rest of the world, via Twitter.
Now of course, Foschia wouldn’t have gone to such lengths if it had been a rudimentary error.
It was because the hotel had displayed:
“Grilled Moroccan Aborigine and Rocket Salad”. Obviously, what they meant to say was, “Aubergine”.
Now, I can’t really blame the staff for this spelling error, since schools are so focused at the moment on preaching identity politics, rather than teaching kids how to spell and add up. I myself suffered under this educational regime, and with even one and a half masters degrees, I still can’t spell.
But back to the ABC and Liz Foschia.
This is the kind of ambulance chasing, faux-issue creating, gutter journalism that one might expect from the most hysterical right-wing shock jocks, if not the dreaded Murdoch media.
Rather than real journalism, people like Liz Foschia are more concerned about shameless self-promotion, and using race (not because she particularly cares about Aborigines) to hit the Hyatt Hotel and people she doesn’t like with a big stick of self-righteousness.
Instead of real journalism, our taxes are paying for the ABC and the likes of Liz Foschia to create a race issue out of a typo, and to bait, and cultivate hurt, ill feeling and division in the Australian community.
It’s their ABC.
Hard yakka
A $21 billion coal mine in central Queensland, that would have generated significant export wealth and created thousands of jobs, is shut down by… a Yakka Skink. No, I’ve never heard of it either. A quick check of the Department of Environment website advises:
“The yakka skink is an extremely secretive species, hiding under rocks, in hollow logs or ground vegetation, or in burrow systems. Its presence is often indicated by a pile of droppings near shelter sites.”
So the presence of a pile of lizard shit somewhere near the site has shut down this huge investment, and will be barrier to some of the world’s poor accessing their basic energy needs.
Will the Green madness ever end?
Blocking Adani coal mine approval ‘dangerous’ for Australia, ‘tragic’ for world: Tony Abbott
A tribute to Michael Clarke
Michael Clarke announced yesterday that he would retire at the end of the Ashes series, along with getting trounced at Trent Bridge and handing the Ashes back after our fourth successive loss in England. Nevertheless, he has been a brave servant of Australian cricket, and has (or had) seen it out of one of the worst slumps in its history.
A lot of people didn’t like Michael Clarke from the start. I think it was for the same reasons I always thought he was tops. He was blonde, flashy, luck just seemed to fall his way, he had a hot girlfriend. Apparently, this sort of thing disqualifies you from being a good cricketer, regardless of whether you score 151 on debut.
I recognised the steel in him when he fought his way back into the Test side in 2006 after being dropped in late 2005. The doubters were silenced for a while, at least when he scored two vital centuries, in the second and third Ashes tests of the 2006/07 series, at crucial points of the matches which mattered – particularly his 124 in Adelaide. The Adelaide Test has been immortalised by the dramatic Aussie win on the fifth day, when we miraculously bowled out the Poms cheaply, and manically chased down the 168 for victory. But when Clarke came out to bat on the third day, Australia was 4 for 257, and soon 5 for 286, looking in all sorts after England had scored 551. Clarke stuck it out to make 124, to help get the Aussies in striking distance, and without which the fifth day heroics would not have been possible. Again, we remember this series for the way we inflicted 5-0 revenge after the heartbreak of 2005, but if Clarke had failed that day, the English could well have routed us, levelled the series, and been in high spirits, rather than practically already defeated, at Perth.
Clarke played through the golden run When Ponting’s side equalled Steve Waugh’s record of 16 test wins in a row, but also endured the awful slump, and it was, truly, awful, when the likes of Haydn, Langer, Warne and McGrath all retired at the end of the noughties.
His highest Test score of 329 was made against India in 2012 in the second Test at the SCG. (It was only after this innings, and Clarke’s string of centuries once being elevated to the captaincy, that my own father was finally prepared to accept that Clarke might be a half decent cricketer..) Like his Ashes century in Adelaide, it came at a crucial time – Australia was 3 for 37, behind by over 150 on India’s first innings, a series in the balance, and the very real possibility of yet another disastrous Aussie collapse leading to another disastrous home series loss. That Clarke was able to not only turn this around, but score a triple ton in the process, then back it up with a double century in the fourth test when Australia was in a similar position, speaks to the way in which the force of an individual’s will can affect the outcome of a whole series, which we won 4-0, and with out overstating the importance of sport, affect the outcome of history itself.
Even after this success, Australia still struggled to assert itself, struggling against South Africa and Sri Lanka at home in the next Aussie summer, then getting trounced in India in the lead-up to the Ashes. But despite our Ashes loss 3-0 in England in 2013, the signs of revival, and the emergence of Steve Smith, were obvious.
The hard work of Clarke and co. payed off with another 5-0 home Ashes win straight after, yet this all threatened to come unstuck again in the South African tour of February and March 2014. It was the third test in Cape Town, the series was tied at one all, and Clarke found himself in, facing the fiercest bowling attack in the world, with Australia in trouble. The bowling attack was so fierce that it struck a number of vicious blows, one of which broke a rib, but he batted on to score 161 and set up a match winning first innings lead and ultimately win the series.
I consider this to be Clarke’s finest hour. I think he understood that everything he had worked for with his team could be lost if he gave in that day. The return to form of Mitchell Johnson, the rise of David Warner and Steve Smith to the top of the world batting charts, even the winning back of the Ashes, could all be for nothing, and Australia could slump again, if he didn’t make a stand. Against England in Adelaide, India in Sydney, and South Africa in Cape Town, he stood up to turn the course of a match, of a series, and the fate and pride of Australian cricket. He put his body on the line in the Cape Town, and he has never been the same since, especially after his back injury struck again. I wish I could be writing about similar heroics from Clarke in Edgbaston or Trent Bridge, (or maybe The Oval in a week or so,) and I certainly hope this does not auger for another slump, (I don’t think it does,) but I think Clarke really has given all he can give.
I don’t think it is overblown to call him a hero. I also think it is important to recognise that cricket is more than a game – it requires individuals to display some of the finest human characteristics in order to win, and is a magnificent way to channel and encourage patriotic pride and peacefully settle national rivalries. In this respect I think Michael Clarke has been a fantastic example to us all.
I wish him all the best for the future, I hope he is happy, and I will always cherish the whole hearted contribution he has made to Australian cricket, and to our country.
Australia generous to refugees
“Australia is considered to be the world’s most charitable nation for resettling refugees, when calculated per head of population and by national wealth according to a Refugee Council report.”
More evidence that taking control of the borders prevents desperate people being drowned in unseaworthy vessels, and enables our nation to be more generous to genuine refugees.
http://www.skynews.com.au/news/national/2015/08/08/australia–generous–to-asylum-seekers.html
Socialist scaredy-cats
Originally published August 9, 2015.
It’s really quite hard to understand why Universities and both their academic and student bodies seem so debate-shy these days. As a first year undergraduate Boethius fondly remembers days spent in Naughton’s pub instead of the lecture room, the earnest types standing behind tables on the south lawn handing out ‘Resistance’ party literature, and the often spirited debates that took place under the vaults of the Priestly building around student election time. In those days (ca. 1985) one could actually debate a real life Socialist and expect a coherent answer – before about 6pm anyway.
For the conservative on campus, back then as today considered nothing less than a bodily manifestation of Satan Prince of Darkness, it was quite possible to engage one’s political opponent in something that resembled a dialogue, with real words forming actual sentences, and even grammatically congruent speeches. As outrageously novel as it sounds today, a phenomenon known as ‘opinions’ and ‘arguments’ were actually articulated on campus back then, along with metal cans of beer, free condoms, and soft drugs (some things never change).
Alas, today’s Socialist student warriors are not interested in debates, ideas or forming grammatically congruent sentences. Slogans shouted by groups of lemmings are de rigueur now on campus. Ensuring the syllables at the end of each sentence of abuse rhyme is about as much intellectual energy as today’s student activists can apparently muster. Rather than debate a proposition, put forward an argument, and engage with an issue, today’s students take the much easier, though intellectually deformed, option, of simply shouting down and ultimately banning that with which they do not agree – from Swedish thinker Bjorn Lomborg, to Christopher Pyne and his tertiary education reforms, to the elected government and its ministers.
It doesn’t sound like fun at all really, and not much at all by way of preparation for life, apart from a career on the ABC, or as a union hack hoping ultimately for ALP pre-selection.
Photo by Geoff Penaluna
Quote of the Day: Who read’s the Age…
The XYZ has questioned the so-called “independence” of The Age before, but we don’t think we have managed quite a “burn,” as this, seen on a Facebook group:
“A question for you people, does anyone else other than some Saddam Hussein Loyalist read The Age?”
We have nothing more to add, other than this has got to make Quote of the Day.
The Animal Farm of Big Government
Australian politics has recently shown, by example, just how wasteful government is.
Government, as an institution, has become synonymous with ever increasing size, wastefulness, bureaucracy and entitlement.
It’s not just entitlement for any poor Muslim in the world (who is by UN definition born as a could be refugee), or newborn Aborigine child who has been harmed before birth by other Australians who are not yet even born, nor entitlement of Australian retirees sitting in McMansions collecting the pension.
It’s also entitlement for politicians, who must maintain multiple residencies, travel extensively for work, claim expenses so they can fund-raise and so much more. Basically, those in the know know that the Government is a trough, and its such a lucrative trough white people can turn black (if only in their minds) and they get a front row spot at the trough. People run for their lives even when they are perfectly safe in order to get to the trough.
Our Green friends are the pigs from Orwell’s farm. All men are created equal, they proclaim, as they simultaneously establish a pecking order of inequality and special needs to equalise the imbalance. There is dignity in the trough, they proclaim, although you need to wallow in the muck of the political sty and the stinky slops of your own pronounced disadvantage to qualify.
The Greens, like most politicians, are rorters in it for personal gain. The system weeds out those who cannot make the ethical compromises to graduate into power.
The Liberal Democrats call for smaller government, advising that Government is wasteful and corrupt, and needs to be kept as small as possible. But the industry of self serving politicians, of disadvantage and equality victims and victimhood enablers will have none of it.
So next time you see politicians wallowing in their own filth, don’t be surprised to see the counterparts doing the same. They are united in many instincts, and cannot be trusted to push for reductions in the size of the trough.
If you are sick of systemic victimhood and entitlement abuse, don’t look to the pigs for answers.
Abbott “Razor Gang” – XYZ predicts the future
Prime Minister Tony Abbott has announced the creation a “Razor Gang,” in order to instil “root and branch reform” to “restore public confidence” in the parliamentary entitlement system.
The XYZ has never been shy of blowing its own trumpet, so this story practically asks for it. On August 2, The XYZ was only half joking when it suggested that if the travel expenses of all politicians were investigated, the seventh circle of hell would open up beneath Canberra.
Is it unreasonable to suggest, that if The XYZ was (more or less) correct in predicting a full investigation into parliamentary entitlements, some its its other, more outlandish predictions, could also come to pass?
All we are saying, is watch Penny Wong like a hawk..
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/prime-minister-tony-abbott-brings-in-razor-gang-to-blitz-travel-expenses/story-fnpp4dl6-1227473351851
The aim of the game
John Roskam wrote an excellent piece in yesterday’s Financial Review, on the issue of racism in Australia.
Roskam notes that “one of the things we’ve learned is that in Australia, the reaction of authorities to racism is selective.”
Whilst sustained attention, and condemnation has been poured into the Adam Goodes saga, the same cannot be said in relation to other, perhaps more sinister and aggressive displays of hatred and racism.
Roskam notes that:
“At a protest march in Hyde Park in Sydney in 2012, children held up placards advocating the beheading of “infidels”. Interestingly, there’s no record of police detaining and interrogating any of those young people. Meanwhile, at anti-Israel rallies around the country, Jews are routinely subjected to epithets no less offensive than what was shouted at Goodes.”
This is really quite disturbing. Why has their been such a preoccupation with one supposed instance of racism when other, even more ugly forms of it go completely ignored by the authorities and the inner city ‘racism police’?
Roskam’s final issue relates to the politicisation of the AFL:
“It’s one thing for the AFL to support breast cancer awareness on Mother’s Day. But that’s something entirely different from the AFL endorsing a political campaign to change the Australian constitution and divide people according to their race. The AFL promoting the Recognise campaign is entirely different from the AFL stopping racial abuse on the football field. Andrew Demetriou, the former AFL boss, instituted a ‘Green’ round and he said clubs should be aware of the dangers of global warming.”
Is it the place for the AFL to adopt political causes in such a way? Roskam highlights that most of these political causes generally serve a left wing agenda and risk alienating half of the population. But really, should these political causes be played out in the AFL?
Whilst AFL players are seen as role models in the community, surely the aim of the game, well… should be the game. Not the re-engineering of society.
It’s your XYZ.
He said Jehovah! On name calling and offence taking.
There was a time when one could get one’s self quite literally killed for saying the wrong thing, at the wrong time, in the wrong company. As High Priest John son-of-Cleese found, quite painfully, in the historical drama ‘Life of Brian.’ In that re-enactment of real life events from the time of Jesus, John Cleese gets stoned, in a painful, rather than pleasurable, way, simply for uttering the word “Jehovah.”
The period of history to which this documentary refers is that time known to us as “ancient.” This was an historical epoch in which the mob ruled, offenders against the state were impaled on cross beams, and people really were put to death simply for saying things that were deemed to be highly offensive to someone’s sensitivities… Oh, and what did the Romans ever do for us anyway? Apart from the roads, the aqueducts, law and order, and you know how the rest goes…
One might reasonably have thought we had moved on from all of that in the early 21st century, and indeed we have. The public stoning one receives these days for offending some over delicate type of non Anglo-Saxon appearance is, in these enlighthened times, only metaphorical, and carried out by an unseen mob using Twitter, and other forms of social media.
Once the offence taking starts, it’s unlikely to stop there, not until some form of punishment is exacted for the social sin of uttering a word, a phrase, or even a tongue in cheek throw away line, that offends the politically correct wowser brigade. Egged on by socialist students with metaphorical rocks in their hands, and Greens politicians pulling faces like a patient undergoing a colonoscopy, the Twitterati will not stop until the offender’s reputation and livelihood has been crushed. Like the religious fanatics of the past, the present day heresies of homophobia, islamophobia, alleged misogyny, climate change scepticism, racism, ageism, and on it goes, are never tolerated by the ‘enlightened’ zealots of Generation Z(ombie). In the good old days, there were appropriate physical punishments like flaying alive, the rack, and burning at the stake, but today’s zealots have to make do with public shaming, hashtag campaigns, and unlimited access to public broadcasters.
But things may be looking up for the new Puritans. The excellent online magazine Spiked has recently drawn attention to the case of British opinion-giver Katie Hopkins who, as Spiked delightfully puts it, was recently detained by British police for having an opinion.
http://www.spiked-online.com/…/katie-hopkins-questio…/17268…
So be careful what you say. The thought police are on the beat. Someone is listening. Someone is watching. The keyboard warriors and enemies of personal freedoms and free speech are poised at their smart phones and ipads and laptops, just waiting to take offence. And, increasingly, the resources of the State, fuelled by the legislative stupidity of the rights industry, are being invoked and used to enforce the politically correct orthodoxy that so chokes us, both as individuals and society. Whereas the police once walked beats, arrested those who would do us actual and physical harm, and investigated tangible crimes, now they are apparently interested in what we say, the opinions we express, and especially the words we might use.
What was it Voltaire, (or perhaps his biographer,) once famously said, at the height of a now distant epoch that was once called the Enlightenment ? – ‘I don’t agree with what you said but I will defend to the death your right to say it.’ Something like that anyway. Yeah, right, you silly French geezer! The Twitter educated guardians of public order and decency today know so much better than some middle aged boozer wearing a horse hair wig. The cry of today’s keyboard warrior is – ‘I don’t agree with what you said and I’m going to persecute the hell out of you until you can’t say it anymore.’
Even so, we’re sure it’s still safe to say “Jehovah” after a satisfying evening meal accompanied by a pleasing shiraz – for now, anyway. So go ahead citizens, say “Jehovah” as much as you like, while you still can.