The Ethical Case for Repatriation

1
4

From Patriotic Alternative.

A Cultured Thug

How often are we told that immigrants created the West, or as was recently stated on a coin minted in the UK by our ethnically Indian Chancellor of the Exchequer, that “Diversity Built Britain”?  Obviously both statements are fundamentally untrue, although imagine stepping into this alternate reality and consider a few things which would remain the case even if this scenario was authentic.

Let’s consider Newton’s Third Law; “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Obviously, this usually applies to forces in the physical world although when considered philosophically as something like Karma, if immigrants created the West and Diversity Built Britain, and this is to be considered a benefit, who or what suffered as a result.  Did the countries these people and their descendants come from not need their skills and services?  How much have those countries been held back because their best people were bribed to come to the West?

Moral dilemma

Recently I saw a picture outlining the different nationalities currently working in the NHS, this was celebrated.  What it made me think was what the price India as an example paid for the 18,000 health workers they trained who aren’t providing care for their own people, or the 4,000 from Zimbabwe for that matter.  I find it abhorrent that someone would celebrate this in the name of diversity when there are dire consequences for developing nations.  Yes, it is cheaper to import these people than train our own, yes it does help to control wages so that it’s more affordable for large employers like the NHS, but is it moral?  It would be more moral to send our people to get trained in these countries if the cost was the main factor.

The far-left champion plundering developing nations of their skilled workers.

Now that foreigners and their descendants are here, what would motivate them to return?  Let’s say India was a leading developed country and England was a third world developing nation, and I found myself as a second or third or even tenth generation English immigrant working as a structural engineer in India, living the good life, whilst back in my ancestral homeland they didn’t even have a basic sanitation system and people were still defecating in the streets, I’d have to ask myself serious questions about my life choices and where I could add the most value.  Now let’s say India was prepared to pay me 5 x the average annual salary that people in England earned to return to the UK, and everyone in my immediate family would get the same, how could I ethically turn down such an offer.  I would consider not doing so an act of extreme disloyalty.

I imagine some might say that encouraging people of immigrant descent that were born in the West to leave is unfair as many of them will know nothing of their ancestral homelands.  I would suggest that the situation is not dissimilar from the predicament British people found themselves in at the end of the British Raj in India, many families had lived in India for several generations and had never visited the UK prior to them returning.  There are many worse things that could be done to someone than being made to return to live amongst their own people.  Either way it would be voluntary and no-one will be forced to leave, although there may be pressure put on individuals from within their own ethnic communities to leave once the exodus from the West gains momentum.

If millions of people educated in the West, that gained their experience in the West and that add so much value to the West, went back to their ancestral homelands think of the amazing benefits this would bring to those developing nations.  The planet would level up within a couple of generations.  We could have African countries sending people to the Moon or ground-breaking medical procedures or technological advances coming out of the Indian sub-continent. This injection of talent would have the potential to trigger a new renaissance. The possibilities are endless!

Filling the gap

Now, how about the consequences for the West if all these talented people left, who will do the work they currently do?  Obviously there will be challenges to overcome and changes to be made although we are on the brink of major technological advances in the forms of automation and 3D printing that will soften the blow, there will, however need to be a paradigm shift in the way we develop our own talent.  Currently ethnically British children and particularly boys from poor backgrounds are the worst performing demographic in education.  They are being left by the wayside while cheap labour is brought in to do work they could have been trained to do.  Investing in this community will be how we bridge the gap rather than pilfering talent from developing nations.

Anyone speaking out against repatriation is essentially advocating for developing nations to remain technically and socially inferior to the West, it’s extremely prejudiced and bigoted to do so.