The watershed moment of Rittenhouse

4

As I am sure most of you already know, Rittenhouse has been found not guilty of all charges. What happens next is anyone’s guess. I wrote about the trial a couple of days ago where I ruminated over the strange charges of racism and blacks being all upset about a white boy who shot three whites. Well, one white and two Jews. In that piece I posted a screenshot of a Tweet calling for someone to “pull a Jack Ruby on Rittenhouse”, which is kind of fitting when you think about it seeing as Ruby, whose real name was Jacob Leon Rubenstein, was a Jew.

Now the white boy who killed Jews has been found not guilty and the Jewish propaganda units such as the ADL have the potential for a real problem.

The problem is not so much that white guys can now shoot up rioters in the streets. The problem is that normies might begin to start connecting the dots. Thus, their first step will be to attempt to immortalise the memories of the two rioters that were slain. Take this tweet as an example:

We see here this tactic, also known as the Leo Frank move, in action; ‘May their memories be a blessing and a revolution’. But the use of the term revolution in this context may prove to be an oversight. And here we come to the connecting the dots part. How is it possible to claim that Rittenhouse targeted these men? And not just targeted; hunted. As the trial has shown, Rittenhouse defended himself against those that were already attacking him. In this case it was the hunters who were killed, not the intended victim. But she insists that he targeted them because they were Jews. It seems a trifle far-fetched to infer that the young man purposely selected these guys out of the entire press of rioting animals. Are big noses really that prominent?

But of course he didn’t pick them out; they targeted him. Which means that the next dot to connect is what are the chances? What are the chances that in this large group of rioters that two thirds of those that attacked Rittenhouse were Jews? And not just Jews, but Jews with long and disturbing criminal records. How many in that crowd of rioters who burned down and destroyed a good portion of the business area of that town were also Jews? The numbers seem to suggest a very high portion indeed.

This is why the American Jewish diaspora now has a problem that they need to contain or at the very least distract from or it could begin to blow up in their faces. Jews have a very long and undistinguished history of getting on the wrong side of their hosts which is almost always due to their own actions. We see this again playing out in nations all over the world.

Many commentators on the right are arguing that the racial aspect of this case was the question of whether whites were still going to be allowed to legally defend themselves from physical harm. While that is pertinent, it is not the end of the matter. The real underlying racial aspects at play are those involving the identity of the racial group that orchestrated the chaos, anarchy and madness that overwhelmed cities in the USA in the summer of 2020.

The ADL have written about the judgement but they have been very low key on the subject of whites shooting Jews, preferring instead to highlight various antisemitic social media messages and the like so as to showcase the horrible Nazis that somehow still exist in the world today. In other words, they are treading carefully.

This entire trial, legitimate or not, has been a setback for those who seem set on destroying America as a white conservative nation. If they’re not careful it could become a watershed moment.

Originally published at Pushing Rubber Downhill. You can purchase Adam’s books here.