Crooked Hillary is in trouble. I’m referring to her as Crooked Hillary because the fact has now been established beyond all reasonable doubt, and it would be remiss of us not to. Now She is trying to pull off the ultimate smokescreen, publicly (and deliciously ironically given that the crux of their investigation is whether or not she was a little too loose with state secrets) goading the F.B.I into publicly releasing sensitive information that is crucial to an ongoing investigation. This is Clinton’s press release in regard to this most recent bombshell:
“The American people deserve to get the full and complete facts immediately. It’s imperative that the bureau explain this issue in question, whatever it is, without any delay… I think people a long time ago made up their minds about the emails.”
This statement alone not only proves Hillary’s contempt for the importance of national security when it’s convenient (be it lazily checking her work emails at home, or demanding that sensitive state secrets be made public when it’s convenient for her Presidential aspirations), but also her contempt for the intelligence of American voters.
Hillary knows full well (as do voters) that no organisation worth its salt would ever jeopardise an investigation by prematurely making evidence public before they are good and ready (they leave that sort of thing to nominees with insecure servers). Even if Weiner’s laptop had damning evidence of Hillary Clinton illegally supporting terror by giving a pep talk to Osama Bin Laden in a cave in Tora Bora for a million dollars back in 2002, she could still safely posture and demand disclosure as a sign of her innocence with complete impunity, safe in the knowledge that no damaging or incriminating information will be released by the Feds until long after the election.
The statement by Clinton is nothing short of ridiculous. It is akin to Ivan Milat being arrested and declaring “I know nothing about these murders. If the cops think I’m guilty, I challenge them to release everything they have on me right now and let the public decide!”. Such a statement may have made a defiant Ivan seem innocent and hard done by. A victim of the system. It wouldn’t have made the police simply roll over and release everything they had on him, perhaps risking a mistrial. It definitely wouldn’t have made him innocent. If anything, Hillary’s reaction indicates that there is indeed fire amid all this smoke.
The statement is also an inditement of the attitude of Hillary Clinton toward the sensitive nature of classified information, as did her carefree reveal of American nuclear strike protocol during the third Presidential debate. Both of these examples indicate that the investigation into breaches of national security and other matters that we aren’t aware of yet are probably well founded. Trump is accused of many things, but he is very secretive when it comes to sensitive internal matters of his organisation including his own tax returns. He has also indicated that he prefers more secure verbal communication than emails, and highlighted security concerns about Anthony Wiener long before anyone at the White House ever did.
A compelling argument can be made that although Trump is loud and brash, he does at least know how to protect sensitive information, and realises the importance of doing so. Hillary seems to regard such things as an annoyance to be circumvented whenever convenient. She just doesn’t get it, and seems to incriminate herself further every time the (C) on a document gets in the way of H.R.C.
The choice is now clearer than ever. Who is more able to work effectively with National Security and Federal Law Enforcement? The candidate who is rough around the edges, yet understands only too well concepts like industrial espionage and the ramifications of loose lips in any organisation, whether his own or the nation, or the candidate who is under serious criminal investigation from these very organisations and will never have their respect even if she happens to be exonerated.
It’s your XYZ.
Photo by Girard At Large 
