2016 was the year of Western revolt. The British voted for Brexit, the Americans for Trump, and in Australia Pauline Hanson burst back onto the political scene. The common factor was the recognition that mass immigration was in fact mass replacement immigration, so White people voted for policies and politicians whom we believed would end it.
The decade since has been a wake up call regarding the nature of democracy. The Australian newspaper recently boasted that Australia’s Howard government set the template for handling “illegal” immigration:
Indeed, the Tampa Model was exported throughout White countries:
- Dogwhistle racism
- Quietly escalate “legal” replacement migration to previously unimaginable levels
- Present your party as the “tough on illegal immigration party” until your native citizens realise they’ve been betrayed
- Party implodes, only to be replaced by another controlled opposition who pulls the same routine
In America, Donald Trump has at times shown promising signs of success in reducing immigration and removing illegal immigrants, yet he has embroiled Americans in another forever war.
In Great Britain, Prime Minister Boris Johnson betrayed the entire point of Brexit and let in millions of foreigners. The other Brexit hero, Nigel Farage took over Reform UK, which recently won a slew of local council elections but has softened its stance on immigration, prompting Rupert Lowe to establish Restore Britain which touts the policy of remigration.
In Italy, Georgia Meloni did much the same as Boris, and is now complaining that she faces a challenge from the far right – which she had pretended to be in order to gain power. In Germany the AfD has just won a smashing victory in a West German state, but time will tell whether the party with a Lesbian leader with a Sri Lankan partner can practice what it preaches.
State repression against nationalist activists and political parties is common in the supposedly “free world”, and thousands have been jailed for social media posts. The French and British states are also pursuing politically motivated corruption charges against Le Pen and Farage respectively.
In Australia One Nation has surged to be neck and neck with Liberal and Labor, but like other purportedly populist parties which either attain or are about to attain power, it too is sending mixed messages on immigration.
To reiterate, across the West populist parties are electorally destroying long established conservative parties, and absorbing huge numbers of working class White voters who would previously have voted for Labor/socialist parties. In many cases these populist parties water down or even reverse their strict anti-immigration stances, or fail to deliver on their promises once in office.
For White people then, for several years we have stood on the cusp of achieving our goal of securing the existence of our people through democratic means, ie voting for political parties who promise to reduce or end mass replacement immigration and enact remigration. Despite repeated repression and betrayal we keep doggedly voting for the most right wing parties we can, and establish new parties when the previous hope fails us. In Ireland and England, the next phase of the political struggle is already underway, with patriots taking direct action to evict migrants and block their entry.
In Australia, the question of whether this will even be allowed is being tested this week. The Albanese government used the pretext of an overseas conflict spilling over on Bondi Beach to ban the White Australia Party. Moreover, the laws are so vaguely worded and cover so wide a scope that it would practically make any public opposition to mass replacement immigration illegal, and could even be used to ban One Nation.
Thankfully the legislation was so hastily drafted that it is woefully unconstitutional, a fact admitted by state media operation the ABC, as apparent damage control given the likelihood of its overturning by the High Court – should the High Court be proven to be independent from government coercion.
Thus the question at stake in Australia and across the West is whether or not we will be allowed to vote against our own genocide.
We are not merely opposed by a collection of random left wing and fake right parties who just happen to favour mass immigration, but will happily defer to popular opinion if they lose an election. These parties are the public face of globalism, a system representing banking, economic, ethnic and dark, satanic interests whose express goal requires the extermination of White Christians.
The electoral contest is just as existential for them and their entire system as it is for us. Hence the mail-in ballots, the election “fortifying”, the cancelling of election results, the banning of parties and the jailing of activists and ordinary people who express themselves online.
The argument that the system of Liberal Democracy is itself designed to destroy us is looking increasingly strong. Over the next couple of months in Australia, and the next couple of years in Europe and America, that question will be settled once and for all.
