Australian politician Pauline Hanson first appeared on the political scene 30 years ago when she stood as an independent after being dropped by the Liberal Party as their candidate for the awful crimes of racism and bad-think. Hanson won the seat, and she has been a feature of Australian politics ever since. Back in the day she was infamous for several catchphrases which became so mocked by the mainstream culture that some clown even made a song about it.
One of her more well known sayings was her claim that Australia was in danger of being “swamped by Asians”. Unfortunately for Australians, Hanson was far more correct than anyone could have ever imagined, not least those actually behind the nefarious Marxist plot known publicly as multiculturalism. In the three decades since she first made that claim, Australia has been inundated with ever increasing amounts of mainly Chinese and Indian nationals. The Australia of today is unrecognisable from the Australia of thirty years ago, let alone that of the 50s or 60s.
Pauline Hanson has stuck it out in politics, and as the bipartisan policy of unrestricted mass immigration has continued contrary to the wishes of most actual Australians, her popularity has steadily increased, to the point where her One Nation party is directly challenging the traditional big two.
Unfortunately her unwavering stance on Australia being at risk of being swamped by Asians has become somewhat watered down since the heady days of her political youth.
She went on to criticise Anthony Albanese for not being able to say “radical Islam” and deflecting to “right-wing extremism” after Bondi, and when asked whether the NSN and their planned political party White Australia had a right to exist, replied: “Yes, they do.”
“And it’s up to the people of Australia to vote for it or not for it. And don’t take my answer that I support them at all,” she said.
“It’s not about your colour of your skin. And that’s why I don’t agree with them. It’s not about the colour of your skin. It’s about the person themselves and we have to look at the character and do they want to be Australian.
“And we’ve had so many wonderful people here from different cultural backgrounds that are Australian. They come up and they grab me, they embrace me, you know, and and hug me and and they’re proud Australians.
“It’s got nothing to do with the colour. I’ve had people from all different cultural backgrounds stand as candidates for One Nation.”
Apparently someone’s desire to become Australian trumps everything, including the colour of the aspirant’s skin. As long as you want to be Australian then, hey presto, you’re an Aussie, mate. But this is simply not true. You don’t magically morph into an Australian due to a government paper process. You are an Australian by birth, by blood, by history and heritage, and by culture.
None of these interlopers possess any of these requirements. Their cultures are alien and different, and they do not leave those cultures behind when they are granted paper citizenship. Hence the long standing push for ‘multiculturalism’, surely one of the Marxists’ greatest inventions for undermining Western culture.
Inherent in the existence of multiculturalism is the claim that our existing Australian culture is not good enough. That we are lacking in something in ourselves as a people and a nation to the extent that we have to import hordes of incompatible foreigners in order to be able to exist and compete on the world stage. Hence the incoherent phrase, diversity is our strength. But we did not need the myriad benefits of diversity when we tamed this great Southern land and made it into a nation. Nor did we need diversity on the battlefields of Gallipoli, Flanders’ fields, the deserts of Libya, the mountains of Papua New Guinea, the freezing Korean hills, or the Vietnamese jungle. We were more than strong enough for those challenges and our forefathers acquitted themselves with honour and distinction.
Multiculturalism is an insult to our forefathers and to us as a people. It is also a direct attack on our way of life, and completely unacceptable if we wish to remain a distinct nation and people. Anyone pushing for it in any of its forms is our enemy and a traitor to their own nation. Pauline Hanson has a woman’s maternal instincts and is susceptible to hugs from foreigners whose long term goal is to bleed us dry and steal our nation from us. For that we can forgive her as she is not a traitor, only misguided.
But forgiveness does not imply weakness. Our nation needs Australian men to stand against the multicultural juggernaut, to send them all back where they came from, but most importantly to ensure that such an attack and betrayal can never happen again. The stakes are high, because if we don’t get it done then we will cease to exist as a nation and a people, and our forefathers’ blood that was shed on those distant battlefields will have all been for nothing.
