In July, Fatima Payman was kicked out of the Labour Party because she sided with her coreligionists in a war nobody cares about in the Middle East. She threatened to set up her own party to represent muslims, but this week she chickened out and announced the formation of a boring nothing party called “Australia’s Voice”.
From their ABC:
Ex-Labor senator Fatima Payman has launched a new political party with no policy positions and which will not require candidates to oppose the war in Gaza, the issue that saw her join the crossbench.
Then what is even the point of it all? At least that lunatic with the horse teeth was somewhat amusing.
Payman is just so frightfully dull:
The Western Australian politician said her party, called Australia’s Voice, would offer “something different” to voters who felt “left behind” by the major parties.
“This is more than a party. It is a movement for a fairer, more inclusive Australia,” she told a press conference at Parliament House on Wednesday…
“On matters that are important, obviously, you know, as a party we would have value alignment. But at the same time, that’s something that even if I disagree with them, it would be important to appreciate that.”
At least she’s angered some aboriginal activists, otherwise we’d have nothing to write about:
Several First Nations leaders involved in the Yes campaign for a First Nations Voice in the recent referendum have privately expressed frustration with the use of the word “Voice” by the party, saying permission was not sought.
Senator Payman said she had consulted broadly with First Nations people but did not say whether she had received approval to use the term.
Get with the program, Fatima. Aboriginal activists have officially culturally appropriated the English word “voice”.
Pauline Hanson meanwhile has rightfully pointed out that Payman is ineligible to serve in the Australian Parliament.
From The Noticer:
She noted Ms Payman’s claim that she has been unable to renounce her birth citizenship because of the conflict in Afghanistan at the time of her nomination, but asked the prime minister to investigate whether she had since had the opportunity to do so and whether she was obliged to take reasonable steps towards it.
What is most intriguing is that someone managed to convince Payman that she could maximise her electoral chances by staying within the confines of acceptable political discourse. Similarly, Christian and Anglo activists are frequently harangued that the key to political power is moderation. This is nonsense.
Literally nobody outside the elites in Australia is happy with the system the way it is. Not Aussies, not muslims, nobody. Clownworld hates everybody. It wants to mix Aussies with Muslims, Chinese, Indians and everybody else it has mass imported into a slightly brown mush of nothingness, to create an obedient slave race of worker drones with no strong convictions.
The only way to challenge Clownworld is to represent your own people as radically as possible and to project strength, fanaticism and piety. It is only a matter of time before new parties which explicitly represent the foreign religions and ethnicities residing in Australia emerge to challenge the liberal order for power, and a party which represents White Australians does the same.
This indicates the key motivation for the Australian Regime’s operatives in convincing Payman not to create a Muslim party – it would only embolden Christians and Anglos to do the same.
As it stands, the whole point of Payman leaving the Labor Party was to represent her own people. Instead she is starting a micro-party which panders to muslims, white-ish far left extremists and perhaps a few random nons. The Greens already hold a monopoly on that territory.
In starting a nothing party with no policies which represents everybody, Payman’s party will peter out before the election, even if she retains her position in parliament.
