Yesterday’s March for Australia again drew tens of thousands of Australians across the country, as reported by The Noticer.
Previous rallies proved so successful in making the reversal of mass replacement immigration the number one issue in the country, that the Australian Regime passed legislation attempting to effectively outlaw said activism. Hence this weekend’s rallies focused on defending free speech, as it is fundamental to engaging in the democratic process to reverse mass replacement immigration.
Naturally, at least one Regime Media outlet attempted to mischaracterise March for Australia attendees as engaging in illegal activity. The Daily Mail published a photo with the caption:
“One protester, who hid behind a scarf, was seen performing an apparent Nazi salute.”

This misinformation is repeated in the body of the article:
“Disturbing images from the rest of the protest showed at least one man performing what appeared to be a Nazi salute, and others attacking supervising police officers.”
This should never have been published, for three reasons:
- The protestor is very clearly pointing their index finger at police, ie it is very clearly not the outlawed salute in question.
- The protestor is wearing a kaffiyeh, the checkered headscarf popular with pro-Palestinian activists. This indicates that the protestor is an antifa counterprotestor, not a March for Australia attendee.
- This fact is reinforced by two photos taken by beckonthedawn and published by The Noticer, which indicate that the kaffiyeh-wearing protestor was a member of a pitifully small Antifa contingent, several of whom were arrested by police on Flinders Street after throwing projectiles.
To reiterate, there was no outlawed salute and the protester in question was an antifa counterprotestor anyway.
Note that the Daily Mail was careful to use the wording “apparent” and “appeared to be.” They know they’re lying. The rest of the article devoted most of its print space to mischaracterising MFA attendees as extremists.
Similarly, violence committed by Marxist agitators was reported as though it was committed by MFA attendees. It is worth noting that at past protests, Victoria Police distinguished the exemplary behaviour of Aussie patriots compared to the violence of the extreme left. Available footage indicates this pattern was repeated yesterday.
These misrepresentations reflect the narrative emanating from the very top. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is on record saying that his “movement” owes it to history or something to defeat “right wing populism”.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says his mission to destroy One Nation is a matter of national importance because “we owe it to history.” pic.twitter.com/sBINSl5bXF
— Anthony Khallouf (@ausvstheagenda) August 30, 2026
All this hysteria deliberately obscures the fact that the ordinary Aussies who marched this weekend are not extremists or violent criminals in any way. If fact they represent the views of the people who support the most popular political party in the country, One Nation. In other words, the view that free speech should not be impinged upon, and that mass replacement immigration must end and be reversed, is a natural, moderate, lawful and majority view held by most White Australians.
Curiously, One Nation continues to send mixed messages on this policy despite clear indications that this is what the vast majority of its supporters want, and that it is basically the only reason it is so popular.
This probably won’t stop it from taking government, or at the very least becoming the formal opposition after the next federal election, but it does mean that it will go the way of the Liberal Party if it does not accede to the will of the Australian people.







