Apparently, there is a little tiff going on in the Middle East right now, and as usual our media and social media feeds are being bombarded with videos of explosions.
Again.
What really matters to Australians is a social media post made by Pauline Hanson this weekend, as reported by The Noticer:
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has confirmed that she wants to cap immigrant arrivals at 130,000 per year, and says that would result in net overseas migration of about minus 100,000.
Ms Hanson responded to an X post on Sunday which accused One Nation of having an “insane” target despite talking tough on immigration, and clarified: “130k would be a cap on arrivals, minus all departures (230k last year for example) to arrive at the NoM.”
130k would be a cap on arrivals, minus all departures (230k last year for example) to arrive at the NoM
— Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 (@PaulineHansonOz) March 1, 2026
This is a really big deal, as there has been much confusion among Australian patriots and nationalists regarding what One Nation’s actual immigration/remigration policy is. For example, last month The Noticer published an excellent article by Tim Matheson criticising One Nation on the grounds that it presents as being opposed to mass immigration while seemingly advocating slightly less mass immigration:
“That same interview re-iterated how awful One Nation’s immigration policy is, particularly in line with global trends and the backlash against it. 130,000 migrants a year is still 130,000 too many and this colour-blind boomer nonsense is still prevalent.”
However, on XYZ we have cited One Nation’s official website which promises “zero net migration”, and social media posts by its elected MP’s who claim that the 130k annual cap will result in “net negative remigration.”
This confusion is completely understandable as the party is sending mixed messages, and it is probably why Pauline has personally stepped in.
It is incumbent upon Pauline Hanson and the One Nation party to make this absolutely and repeatedly clear on a national level, and to standardise the language used by its representatives regarding its net negative immigration policy.
The Fake News Media will have yet another meltdown, which is precisely the point. One Nation has everything to gain from loudly proclaiming its net negative immigration policy, as its perception by the Australian public as representing the strongest opposition to mass replacement immigration is the number one reason it is surging in opinion polls.
Indeed One Nation should go further by officially adopting a remigration policy. In essence this would mean moving from passively letting more foreigners leave the country than enter, to actively removing foreigners from Australia. This can be achieved orderly and humanely, and has multiple peaceful historical precedents.
Remigration is very quickly become not merely a mainstream policy, but a standard policy for populist parties all over Europe. In Great Britain, the Restore Britain party under Rupert Lowe has signed up 100,000 members in a fortnight, and will soon swamp Nigel Farage’s Reform Party which appears little more than a Tory front.
Until now, the globalist establishment has been able to maintain the illusion that anybody who openly and unapologetically represents White people will somehow become electorally unpalatable. However, this magic trick is proven wrong every single time as lukewarm cuckservatives are regularly spat out by the Western public.
Lowe’s promise to remigrate millions of foreigners has ignited an energy in native White Britains which Pauline would do well to emulate. Such a policy would all but ensure a One Nation government in 2028.
