Modern democracy of course is a ruse, a sham and a very big lie. To play is to lose as the game is rigged. But that doesn’t mean that we never play. I was a very early advocate of Trump; in fact, on my now defunct blog I predicted his eventual win the day that he nominated for the Republican ticket, for which I was roundly ridiculed. If I had possessed half a brain I would have stuck a thousand dollars on the outcome.
Needless to say, Trump’s two presidencies have been most certainly a net benefit for the USA and also for the world in general. I would have voted for Trump all three times without even thinking about it, even though I know that the game is rigged. We have to take our wins when we can get them while we suffer under the tyranny of ‘their democracies’.
But that doesn’t mean we should vote every time. If the powers behind the democratic scam offer us two candidates that are both as bad as one another but in different ways, then in that case my choice would be to abstain from voting. Consider the ballot for the Ohio gubernatorial election. On the one hand you have a woman who is fanatically pro-abortion, while on the other side is an Indian who is on the record for wanting to replace whites with his own compatriots. Do you vote for baby murder or your own replacement? To me the choice is clear – not only is neither of them an acceptable candidate, they are also both unacceptable from a Christian standpoint.
If we take part in our own destruction then I presume that God would be hard pressed to hear our pleas when that same destruction openly threatens us. In other words, if you are willing to vote for someone who plans to replace you, don’t come crying for help when you’re about to be replaced.
Chris Jackson has an unbearably long screed with all of his usual one sentence per line as he seemingly does not understand how paragraphs work, where he performs some seriously impressive acrobatics attempting to show that as a Christian you must vote for the Indian imposter. But in the end, all of Jackson’s historical contortions don’t change the fact that he does not understand or is not willing to accept the multicultural realities in which we all find ourselves.
Yet Ramaswamy was born in Cincinnati.
Under the governing constitutional doctrine established in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, he is an American citizen.
Petersen may criticize birthright citizenship. He may argue for a different constitutional interpretation or a different conception of national identity.
But rejecting an American citizen’s participation in political life principally because of Indian ancestry is not the same thing as evaluating the candidate’s ability to serve the common good.
The distinction is not subtle.
Petersen’s statement that the candidate has no place in Ohio politics regardless of his views expressly places ancestry and religious identity ahead of public policy.
Notwithstanding whatever piece of paper Ramaswamy might hold, he is not, never was, and never will be an American. Just as every Englishman born in India discovered in 1948 that he had no right to remain in that country. And yes, ancestry and religious identity must be ahead of public policy as it is precisely because we have ignored that truth for the last sixty years that we find ourselves in this mess. Politics is downstream of culture.
Jackson thinks that because some of Ramaswamy’s policies are acceptable then the fact that he actively works to promote people from his own ethnic background at the expense of actual Americans is neither here nor there. But Jackson goes further than this. He stands firmly on the principle that a person’s ethnicity should have no bearing on whether or not they are suitable for office. He then conflates a rejection of voting for an individual based on their race with being a National-Socialist. By that metric, Lee Kuan Yew was a Nazi. But it’s not 2015 anymore, and screaming and pointing Nazi or racist at someone just doesn’t have the intended effect.
Jackson fails to understand that every other race on the planet except for whites routinely vote according to ethnic and religious lines, and we have filled our nations with them. They claim the status of being an American or an Australian while retaining all of their ethnic cultural values. Letting them into the country is one thing, but voting for them to govern over us is masochistic folly, while Jackson’s attempts to guilt trip us into voting for our own destruction is obscene.
I don’t remember the part in the Bible where a native population was ordered by God to vote for its own replacement and eventual destruction. But the craziest thing about Jackson’s stance is that Ramaswamy is a Hindu. In other words, he follows a religion that worships demons. Quite frankly as a Christian the choice between voting for a proponent of baby sacrifice to Baal or a foreigner who worships demons is no choice at all. That this even needs to be explained mystifies me. Hopefully Jackson will be able to learn that a Christian does not vote for a Hindu, an Indian is not and never will be an American, and most importantly, a sentence does not make a paragraph.
