Lots of people are becoming aware of the debt based monetary system, the international banking cartel and of the Jewish over-representation in regards to wielding power in this system. Combined with this, the Epstein files are awakening people to sex trafficking pedophile blackmailing operations that keep banker approved political, commercial and propaganda “investments” in line.
In the alternative media space we hear about the final days of the American Empire, the collapse of the West, the debt bubble bursting, the coming World War III. The list goes on.
The debt based monetary system is the engine that has facilitated the world we live in since Nixon took the USA off the Gold Standard. That the majority of the people who have been behind facilitating the debt and benefitting from the usury are Jews is nothing new in history. People seem to think that when the US Federal Reserve was created that the battle to gain complete control of the world was over because this was “unprecedented”. But it’s not.
The battle between military and money is as old as civilisation itself. For Game of Thrones fans think of the scene of Peter Baylish getting a rude shock from Cerci Lanister. There are those who control the money and influence and there are those who control the soldiers.
There have been plenty of times in history where Kings or Emperors were beholden to their creditors. What strategy did those, who successfully broke free of their creditors’ control, traditionally use?
The first thing they would do is deliberately default on the loan, then they would arrest their creditors, seize their assets and have them executed or exiled. As long as a King could feed his army and ensure that his soldiers could pillage his enemies’ wealth, then it didn’t ultimately matter how many debts they had.
Famously, Adolf Hitler regenged on Germany’s debts and arrested a Rothchilds banker. The Rothchilds gave loans instead to Churchill and Roosevelt and the rest is our current version of history. The downside of relying on your army to reneg on your debts is that it needs to be the best one. If your creditors can simply cozy up to someone with a better army than yours, you’re in trouble.
The world’s current best army is the one belonging to the United States. The US spend 3 times more than its next biggest competitor China per year on its military budget. Donald Trump is also making the USA self sufficient again. He just bullied Denmark to give the USA permanent access to Greenland for use in missile defence and to extract rare earth metals. He has secured control of the Panama Canal and blocked Venezuela from dealing with China for oil by kidnapping their President.
So why should the USA pay its debts? Why not act like Kings of old?
Well there used to be this guy called Epstein. Only now all of this blackmail stuff is coming out and hardly anyone seems to care. A news story just came out about a convicted pedophile drag queen getting a city sponsored parade in honour of his life just after it was reported that he died in an alley after participating in an orgy that involved a dog. This sort of stuff is mainstream now. Pedophile sex trafficking politicians in this sort of environment just get away with it. No one is even shocked anymore. The leverage on these people is gone.
So why should the USA pay its debts?
In Medieval times nearly all loans to Kings were done by Jews due to the prohibition on usury on Christians. To prevent being defaulted upon and kicked out of a country, Jewish creditors would need to successfully play off Kings against one another or lend to rivals within the land. But if there was a guy who had a bigger badder army than anyone around him, foreign or domestic, then the Jewish creditors were vunerable. It’s no different with today’s international bankers, though we are sold the lie of a “rules based order”. That order only exists because the United States imposed it on the rest of the world with its military.
Money lenders are no longer exclusively Jewish and modern day leaders are no longer Kings, but the power dynamic is the same. The oppression of usury vs the might makes right law of the jungle.
Trump has shown he wants a US Empire based order, not a Globalist order and Trump has increasingly used the might vs right tactics to take what he wants.
Empires rule peoples, plural, not a Nation singular. Emperors see themself as divine and therefore all the subjects equally beneath them. Which is why Trump doesn’t distinguish between an immigrant from India and a White man whose history in the USA dates back to the first colony. Is this an impedement to negating the last defence of his creditors that surround his administration? Does he even have the ambition to break free of them?
The USA has one military. The USA has no military threats from its North or South, vast Oceans separating it on its East and West. It is unassailable. Whoever controls it doesn’t have to give a damn about creditors.
The USA doesn’t need to worry about its debts. The creditors of the debts need to worry about them being deliberately defaulted on and them all being arrested.
The only thing that can now change that dynamic is mass non-white immigration leading to a break up of the United States, where rival militaries can once again be pitted against each other. In the rest of the West mass immigration is a matter of malice for the banking elite. In the USA it’s also a matter of survival. Until the break up of the USA occurs, they are vunerable. It’s a race against time.
So why should the USA pay off its debts?
You can find Stephen Wells at Telegram and purchase his books here.
