The far left establishment media has reacted hysterically to posters of a man accused of causing a severe, short-term localised diminution of social cohesion at Bondi Beach last year.
From news.com:
A beloved [sic] street art project has been hijacked by far right extremists after posters depicting alleged Bondi gunman Naveed Akram were plastered across Melbourne in the style of artist Peter Drew’s iconic Aussie series.
About 40 knock-off posters, featuring the accused shooter with the word Aussie beneath his face, appeared across the CBD last week, forcing City of Melbourne employees to work “around the clock” to remove them.
The move has been condemned as “abhorrent”, “devastating” and “just sick”, and for Drew, it cuts directly against what he’s spent the past decade trying to do.
“I’m just a pretty ordinary person who loves Australia,” Drew told news.com.au.
“This project is a celebration of that, and it irritates extremists on both sides. As long as I’m annoying the far right and the far left, I feel like I’m doing something right.”
Drew began the Aussie poster series in 2016, responding to rising anti-immigration sentiment and growing tension around national identity.
It is a standard tactic of the far left to portray their extremist views as moderate. In reality, it is completely reasonable for Aussies to oppose mass immigration on the grounds that it represents an assault on our national identity.
In deliberately misrepresenting and exaggerating the so-called “diversity” of early Australia, and mischaracterising the White Australia Policy as a bad thing, Drew’s artwork is not a conversation, but a very public act meant to offend, insult, humiliate, and intimidate Anglos.
The posters feature Australians photographed in the early 1900s, many of them migrants, sourced from the National Archives of Australia, with the word Aussie printed boldly beneath their faces.
Ironically, many of the images exist because of the White Australia policy, which required non-European residents to apply for exemptions to leave and re-enter the country…
“Because we had a racist policy, we now have an incredible photographic record of how ethnically diverse Australia already was,” Drew said.
“These people lived here. This was already Australia.”
‘They hate the unity the word Aussie creates’.
Drew believes the Bondi shooter posters reveal something deeper – not just provocation, but a rejection of shared identity.
“People on the far left and the far right actually have a lot in common,” he said.
“They hate pluralism. They hate the word Aussie because it gives us a sense of unity.”
This is word salad gaslighting. Drew’s motives are exactly the same as the far left he purports to decry, and for that matter Australia’s entire political establishment. They redefine “Aussie” to mean anybody from anywhere, ie “these people lived here.” As the BAC points out, if anybody can be Australian, then nobody is Australian.
This is where the genius of this “hijacking” comes to the fore. A caveat the government places on the definition of “Aussie” is that anybody can be an Aussie as long as they “share our values”.
These “values” are deliberately vague and always shifting, allowing government officials, with a nasty gleam in their eye, to deport White families who advocate for White interests but don’t have all the right bits of paper which are now, apparently, the only thing that makes you an official Aussie.
However, if there is anything that goes against “Aussie values”, which should surely disqualify one from being considered an “Aussie”, then it is causing a severe, short-term localised diminution of social cohesion at an iconic Australian beach.
But this is something which neither Peter Drew / the far left, nor the Australian political establishment can ever acknowledge – that the Australian citizen Naveed Akram has, by his actions forfeited his Aussie identity, let alone his Australian citizenship.
Because he is not White, and they hate Whites.
These “hijacked” posters expose the definition of a nation as based on “values” rather than race as being completely illogical. The double standard reveals the true motive of mass immigration, and of pro-multiculturalist artwork – to replace Aussies in our own country, and to deny this White genocide by simply redefining what it means to be Aussie.
