David Hiscox published an article on 2nd March 2026 titled ‘The Most Important News Story is One Nation’s Remigration Policy’. It’s occasionally worth demonstrating to the world that the Faaaaaar Right isn’t just an echo chamber. That we do occassionally disagree on things. It simply looks like we are an echo chamber sometimes because we have a lot more self disciplined than our enemies and we keep our disagreements more private and respectful than they do.
David asked me to write an article critiquing his after privately failing to shower him with gushing adoration for it, as is normal in Faaaaaar right echo chamber cults. I didn’t offer my wife up for the communal leader’s harem and I refused to drink the Kool-Aid. Apparently such things aren’t required in our circles. Who knew!?
My main issue with David’s article was instinctive rather than methodical and against its tone, rather than its content. It simply felt wrong. Later I was able to drill down into the content and find specific critiques of more tangible things and I will cover these as well, but my initial gut response was that this article was just too positive towards One Nation.
Pauline Hanson has been the quintessential controlled opposition. Her detractors call her racist, but the truth is it is only her supporters who are racist. Since her debut speech as an elected member of the Liberal Party in 1997, her supporters have clung to her “we are being swamped by Asians” line like a man clinging by his fingernails to the edge of a ciff. She has been all that racists have had to cling to for most of the last 29 years, but she has never been someone that was capable of preventing the racists from falling into the political abyss.
Saying “we are in danger of being swamped by Asians” is the most radical thing Pauline Hanson has ever said or done. Her political comeback was started by appearing on the reality TV show ‘Dancing with the Stars’ which should explain everything. Her party is controlled by a homosexual. At the last election the percentage of non-white candidates in her party was higher than that of Australia as a country. She is not the Messiah, she is a very naughty girl.
So whilst David is technically correct that her recent clarification of her immigration policy to one explicitly stating a goal of net negative immigration, sends a signal to racists that their concerns are being taken seriously, I don’t think it’s anything significant or worthy of any positive press from our side.
Boris Johnson in Great Britain was elected on the back of a wave of anti-immigration sentiment and oversaw the country’s largest wave of immigration in its history. We should expect no different from Pauline and One Nation. The various representatives from her party that spoke at the March for Australia events over the last 6 months, uniformly bent over backwards to say how much they loved non-white immigrants and how much Australia benefitted from them.
One Nation will betray Australia if elected. Their policy of capping immigration to 130,000 per year (resulting in net negative immigration as more immigrants leave Australia than arrive) is one doomed to failure even if they were sincere about implementing it. The Australian Department of Immigration has many different sub-departments and all of its managers have been installed over decades selecting for pro-left wing, non-white immigrant sympathetic tendencies. Just which one of the visa granting departments will the restriction of numbers be applied to? Who will enforce it? What consequences to entreched top bureaucrats who defy the new government’s decrees will there be? Anyone who has seen a Senate Estimates Inquiry will know that getting a straight answer from a bureaucrat is like trying to catch a slimy eel in a pond with your bare hands.
One Nation may announce their policy if elected. Even if they do, expect immigration numbers to continue to rise.
The politicians in One Nation know that they must virtue signal to the racists whom they rely upon for votes. By giving them positive press for that virtue signalling, they get to relax a bit and think that they have succesfully appeased their base of support. This is my main critique of David’s article. I believe he simply wanted to show the carrot to One Nation. Encourage them to keep moving in our direction.
But One Nation has carrots and sugar lumps and fields of the sweetest juicyist fresh green grass on offer from the Isreal lobby and the entrenched establishment. Nothing positive we can offer them can compete. So we must continue to use the stick. We must make them hurt every time they speak a word out of line and constantly pressure them for being too moderate. They must be dragged kicking and screaming into a more radical position until the White Australia Movement can openly participate in this system again. At which point we can part ways with One Nation for good. Take our fingertips off the divot on the rock wall and grab onto a firm ledge to climb out of the crevice and back onto solid ground.
You can find Stephen Wells at Telegram and purchase his books here.
